Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 200057.0% pass rate
from 877 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(23% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(110% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
-
4.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.57% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.46% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.46% fail on Ball joint
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.80% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.80% fail on
Springs
(70% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.23% fail on
Sub-frames
(81% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Axles
- 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
4.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.11% fail on Strengthening plate
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.8% fail on
Body
- 1.1% fail on Other body component (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Panel
- 0.11% fail on Mounting fixings
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (66% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.46% fail on Tank
- 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.11% fail on System
-
0.34% fail on
Transmission
(92% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Joints (92% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.11% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.23% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Bumpers
-
0.23% fail on
Cabs
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.11% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.11% fail on Carrier
-
0.11% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
- 0.11% fail on Loading door
-
0.11% fail on
Doors
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Door condition
-
0.11% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.11% fail on Floor
-
0.11% fail on
Seats
- 0.11% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.11% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.11% fail on Boot lid condition
-
4.4% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
12% fail on
Brakes
(36% better than other 2000 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(40% better than other 2000 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
(38% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (43% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
(38% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(73% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt
- 0.68% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.68% fail on
Rbt
- 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(39% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.91% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(68% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.68% fail on Brake pads
-
0.11% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.11% fail on Brake discs
-
0.11% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.11% fail on Lever
-
0.68% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.34% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.23% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.11% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 0.11% fail on Servos
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.23% fail on Lever
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.11% fail on Valves
-
0.11% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
- 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
7.1% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2000 vans)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(43% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
(54% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(66% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(72% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators (74% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Headlamps
(85% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.68% fail on
Electrical equipment
(78% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.11% fail on Horn
-
0.57% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.57% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
9.5% fail on
Visibility
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 3.4% fail on Washers
-
0.68% fail on
View to rear
- 0.68% fail on Mirrors
- 0.11% fail on Bonnet
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.11% fail on Windscreen
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Requirements
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.11% fail on Size/type
-
2.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.34% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (73% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.34% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.34% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
2.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.1% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.1% fail on Registration plates
-
0.91% fail on
Steering
(86% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.46% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.11% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.11% fail on Locking devices
-
0.46% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Rams
- 0.11% fail on Other components
-
0.46% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.11% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.11% fail on Anchorages