MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2000
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2000
57.9% pass rate
from 1,306 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms (31% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.077% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Springs (66% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings (58% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.077% fail on Axles
      • 0.077% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.077% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.8% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.077% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (49% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (48% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (51% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (48% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.69% fail on Horn (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.077% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamps (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Headlamp (78% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.54% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.077% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.077% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Brakes (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (50% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (48% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (53% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.00% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake performance (75% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance (76% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (73% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.077% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance (58% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.077% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.077% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.84% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.23% fail on Brake discs and drums (79% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Brake discs (78% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.54% fail on Pedal
      • 0.077% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.31% fail on Lever
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.15% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.077% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 0.077% fail on Servos
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.077% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.077% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.77% fail on View to rear
      • 0.77% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.077% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.077% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (53% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.1% fail on Chassis
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.69% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
    • 1.1% fail on Body
      • 0.54% fail on Other body component
      • 0.46% fail on Panel
      • 0.077% fail on Body condition
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Transmission (90% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Joints (93% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Prop shafts (80% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints
        • 0.077% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.31% fail on Towbar
      • 0.31% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Load security
      • 0.23% fail on Tailgate (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Tailgate condition (12 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.077% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.077% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.077% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.077% fail on Carrier
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.077% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
    • 0.077% fail on Floor
    • 0.077% fail on Cabs
      • 0.077% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Size/type
  • 3.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment
    • 0.23% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (69% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.077% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.077% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.38% fail on Spark ignition (69% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.077% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 1.2% fail on Steering (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.077% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.31% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
      • 0.077% fail on Operation
    • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.077% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.077% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.077% fail on Steering play
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment
  • 0.077% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.077% fail on Anchorages