MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2000
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2000
56.8% pass rate
from 1,432 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 8.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.0% fail on Stop lamp (32% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Battery
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp (56% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Horn (40% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Individual lamps (60% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (71% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.21% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.14% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.070% fail on Lamp
      • 0.070% fail on Switch
    • 0.070% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.7% fail on Prescribed areas (21% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting (72% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Subframe mounting (74% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 5.5% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Fitment
    • 2.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms (38% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (35% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Wheel bearings (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Front (64% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Tie bars/rods (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts (94% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Front drive shafts (94% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Constant velocity joints (94% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.070% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.070% fail on Location
    • 0.070% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.070% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.070% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.070% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.070% fail on Axles
      • 0.070% fail on Axle beam
  • 11% fail on Brakes (48% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (35% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Components (33% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.9% fail on Valves
        • 0.63% fail on Hoses (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.070% fail on Operation
      • 0.070% fail on Leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Rear wheels (59% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.98% fail on Hub components (55% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.070% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.070% fail on Brake back plates
    • 0.70% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal
        • 0.56% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.14% fail on Condition
    • 0.63% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
    • 0.070% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.070% fail on Cable
    • 0.070% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.070% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.070% fail on Restricted movement
  • 9.6% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.77% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.42% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.070% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (25% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.0% fail on Condition (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Valve stem (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 5.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (34% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.42% fail on Doors
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.14% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.070% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.14% fail on Seats (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Passengers
      • 0.070% fail on Drivers
    • 0.070% fail on Load security
      • 0.070% fail on Tailgate
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (37% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Seat belts (34% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas (41% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.070% fail on Requirements
    • 0.21% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (66% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.98% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.42% fail on Tank
      • 0.35% fail on Cap
      • 0.070% fail on System
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.77% fail on Steering (90% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Steering system (89% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.28% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.070% fail on Free play
        • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.070% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.070% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.070% fail on Towbars
    • 0.070% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.070% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.070% fail on Attachment