Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 200357.2% pass rate
from 1,628 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(16% better than other 2003 vans)
- 9.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 8.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
8.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.8% fail on Front lamps
- 1.8% fail on Rear lamps (40% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.18% fail on All position lamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(51% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Fog lamp (50% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Tell tale
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Individual lamps (66% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Horn
- 1.2% fail on Battery
-
0.68% fail on
Headlamps
(83% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.061% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.061% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.061% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.18% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.061% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.061% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(36% better than other 2003 vans)
-
8.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(41% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 7.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (81% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.74% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (56% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
5.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(30% better than other 2003 vans)
- 4.6% fail on Component mounting
- 1.1% fail on Spring mounting (68% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting (89% better than other 2003 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(70% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.061% fail on Attachment
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints (53% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.98% fail on
Wheel bearings
(59% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Front (52% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.061% fail on Rear
-
0.18% fail on
Drive shafts
(96% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.061% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.061% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.061% fail on General condition
-
0.061% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.061% fail on Attachment
-
0.061% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.061% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.061% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.061% fail on Condition
-
0.061% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.061% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(41% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(54% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(52% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Pipes (39% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Valves (85% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Hoses (71% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(52% better than other 2003 vans)
-
4.0% fail on
Brake performance
(69% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Front wheels (54% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rear wheels (78% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Service brake performance (79% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.061% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
(45% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
- 0.061% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.49% fail on ABS
-
0.25% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
- 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.25% fail on
Pedal
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake
(86% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.061% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.061% fail on Cable
-
0.061% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.061% fail on
Components
- 0.061% fail on Pipes
-
0.061% fail on
Components
- 0.061% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% better than other 2003 vans)
-
9.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(29% better than other 2003 vans)
- 5.8% fail on Wipers
- 2.8% fail on Washers (44% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Mirrors
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen (75% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Bonnet
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
(31% better than other 2003 vans)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Valve stem
-
5.5% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.1% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2003 vans)
-
0.98% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.68% fail on Tank (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Cap
- 0.37% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.25% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2003 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(53% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Body condition (59% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
(45% better than other 2003 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Chassis (45% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.25% fail on
Doors
(77% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other
- 0.061% fail on Drivers
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.18% fail on Passengers
- 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.12% fail on Body security
- 0.061% fail on Speedometer
-
1.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(72% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(62% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.80% fail on Prescribed areas (73% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.49% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Requirements
- 0.061% fail on Attachment
-
0.12% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(93% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.12% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (93% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(62% better than other 2003 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate
-
0.98% fail on
Steering
(87% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2003 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.061% fail on
Free play
- 0.061% fail on Steering rack
- 0.061% fail on Steering rack
- 0.061% fail on Ball joint
-
0.37% fail on
Power steering
- 0.37% fail on Operation
- 0.061% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.061% fail on Steering operation
-
0.55% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2003 vans)
-
0.55% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.43% fail on Attachment
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Towbars
- 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure