Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2003
58.2% pass rate
from 1,593 tests in 2020
(19% better than other 2003 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.88% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.063% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters (70% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Switch
    • 0.56% fail on Headlamps (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp (87% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.19% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.13% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.063% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension (26% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.69% fail on Linkage
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 7.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.1% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (60% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.38% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Mounting (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Coil spring (94% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.31% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.19% fail on Axles
      • 0.13% fail on Axle
      • 0.063% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.19% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames (83% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (54% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (61% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (63% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (65% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (66% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.63% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (87% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance (87% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance (86% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake linings and pads (49% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (81% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Cable
    • 0.44% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.44% fail on Lever
    • 0.38% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Load sensing valves (84% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.25% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.063% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.063% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.063% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on View to rear
      • 0.69% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (53% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Chassis
      • 2.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.38% fail on Joints
        • 0.25% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.063% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.38% fail on Drive shafts (91% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Body
      • 0.31% fail on Other body component
      • 0.25% fail on Panel
      • 0.063% fail on Body condition
    • 0.56% fail on Exhaust system (85% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.56% fail on Tank
    • 0.31% fail on Towbar
      • 0.19% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.13% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.25% fail on Cabs
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.063% fail on Steps
    • 0.19% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Loading door
      • 0.063% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.063% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (86% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
      • 0.063% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.063% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.063% fail on Carrier
    • 0.063% fail on Floor
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.063% fail on Undertray
  • 6.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.8% fail on Compression ignition (51% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (97% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.38% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.13% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition (77% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.063% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks (85% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.5% fail on Tyres (36% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (60% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (43% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (49% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
    • 0.063% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.63% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.56% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Condition
  • 0.50% fail on Steering (93% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.063% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.063% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
  • 0.13% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.13% fail on Speedometer