MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2004
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2004
62.3% pass rate
from 1,698 tests in 2020
(26% better than other 2004 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.18% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (47% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (47% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Horn (44% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.059% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.82% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (82% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.82% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Switch
    • 0.18% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.059% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.059% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage
      • 0.53% fail on Pins and bushes (57% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 5.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (86% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.59% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.059% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.059% fail on Mounting
    • 0.29% fail on Other suspension component (65% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames (69% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 11% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (53% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.12% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (79% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (61% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance (69% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.059% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (88% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2004 vans)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.059% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.059% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (68% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (44% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.59% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.35% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Load sensing valves (85% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.059% fail on Servos
      • 0.059% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.059% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.059% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.059% fail on Additional braking device
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (22% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.53% fail on View to rear
      • 0.53% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.059% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.059% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (66% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.41% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.35% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Pipe
    • 0.41% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts (96% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints (96% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts (81% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
        • 0.059% fail on Prop shaft
      • 0.059% fail on Belts
    • 0.35% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Body (77% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.12% fail on Doors (85% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
      • 0.059% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.059% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.059% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.12% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Steps
    • 0.059% fail on Load security
      • 0.059% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.059% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.059% fail on Floor
    • 0.059% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.059% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (27% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.35% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.18% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (80% better than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.059% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.059% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks (83% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks (79% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 3.9% fail on Tyres (44% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (49% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Size/type
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts (58% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (81% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.82% fail on Steering (88% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.41% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.059% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.29% fail on Steering gear (71% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Steering rack (69% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering
      • 0.059% fail on Operation
    • 0.059% fail on Motorcycle derived steering systems
      • 0.059% fail on Head bearings
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment