Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 200869.6% pass rate
from 1,687 tests in 2017
(32% better than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(45% better than other 2008 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
(30% better than other 2008 vans)
- 4.8% fail on Front lamps
- 0.83% fail on Rear lamps (64% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.059% fail on All position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (50% better than other 2008 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(60% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.36% fail on Individual lamps (81% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.2% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(71% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.059% fail on Tell tale
- 0.59% fail on Horn
-
0.41% fail on
Headlamps
(87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.36% fail on Headlamp (89% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.059% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.059% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.30% fail on Battery
-
0.12% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.059% fail on Lamp
- 0.059% fail on Switch
- 0.059% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
5.6% fail on
Position lamps
(30% better than other 2008 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Suspension
(45% better than other 2008 vans)
-
7.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (34% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.95% fail on Linkage condition (95% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.059% fail on Attachment
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
0.95% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (72% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Wheel bearings
(61% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Front
- 0.059% fail on Rear
- 0.47% fail on Front suspension joints (71% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.059% fail on Condition
- 0.059% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.059% fail on General condition
-
0.059% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.059% fail on Component mounting
-
7.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
8.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.83% fail on Windscreen
- 0.24% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2008 vans)
-
7.1% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(37% better than other 2008 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 2008 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Pipes (41% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Hoses
- 0.18% fail on Valves
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
2.6% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 2008 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
(63% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads (54% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Brake discs (90% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.059% fail on Brake back plates
-
1.5% fail on
Brake performance
(82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Front wheels (55% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Rear wheels (87% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Parking brake performance (93% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.1% fail on ABS
-
0.89% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
- 0.89% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.89% fail on
Pedal
-
0.41% fail on
Parking brake
(64% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Condition (64% better than other 2008 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(37% better than other 2008 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
(26% better than other 2008 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Valve stem
-
1.4% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(59% better than other 2008 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions (98% worse than other 2008 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust system (92% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
(80% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.12% fail on System
- 0.059% fail on Tank
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.53% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(78% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.41% fail on Condition
- 0.059% fail on Attachment
-
0.12% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(90% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.059% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
- 0.059% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.41% fail on
Seat belts
(68% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering
(93% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.12% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.059% fail on Drag link end
- 0.059% fail on Lock stop
- 0.059% fail on Steering arm
-
0.36% fail on
Steering system
(91% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.36% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(83% better than other 2008 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Body condition (86% better than other 2008 vans)
-
0.12% fail on
Load security
- 0.059% fail on Tailgate
- 0.059% fail on Loading door
-
0.059% fail on
Doors
- 0.059% fail on Passengers front
-
0.059% fail on
Seats
- 0.059% fail on Drivers
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment