MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2008
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2008
69.1% pass rate
from 1,855 tests in 2020
(35% better than other 2008 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp (43% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.054% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (41% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (54% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (54% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators (60% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.43% fail on Horn (60% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.86% fail on Headlamps (76% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.054% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.054% fail on Switch
    • 0.054% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.3% fail on Suspension (54% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage (200% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes (73% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.054% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.054% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings (71% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (16 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Springs
      • 0.054% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.054% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.054% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.054% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.054% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes (51% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (71% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (54% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.97% fail on Service brake performance (57% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.054% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.81% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.75% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (90% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (sp) (91% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (90% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2008 vans)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (37% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (67% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (59% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake discs and drums (77% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs (77% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.92% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.70% fail on Pedal
      • 0.22% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.32% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.27% fail on Lever
    • 0.054% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.054% fail on Valves
    • 0.054% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.5% fail on Visibility
    • 4.7% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on View to rear
      • 0.32% fail on Mirrors (64% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.22% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (34% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 1.5% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.38% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.054% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.054% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.59% fail on Spark ignition (64% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (64% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.054% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks (79% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks (81% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 4.1% fail on Tyres (35% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.5% fail on Condition (43% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Size/type
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (87% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.22% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.054% fail on Panel
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.054% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Chassis (82% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Chassis condition (82% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.054% fail on Carrier
    • 0.054% fail on Transmission
      • 0.054% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.054% fail on Bearing housing
    • 0.054% fail on Load security
      • 0.054% fail on Loading door
    • 0.054% fail on Undertray
  • 0.59% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (81% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts (73% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
    • 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 0.54% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.54% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.38% fail on Steering (93% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering linkage components (96% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.11% fail on Steering gear (84% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack (83% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Power steering (80% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Operation
      • 0.054% fail on Other components
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.054% fail on Condition
  • 0.054% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.054% fail on Belt(s)/padding