MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Ace » 2009

Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
67.9% pass rate
from 1,037 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.87% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.77% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (63% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.39% fail on Horn
      • 0.29% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.096% fail on Switch
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.096% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.096% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 8.8% fail on Suspension (51% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.39% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (48% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.77% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.096% fail on Springs
      • 0.096% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.096% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.096% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.096% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 8.1% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Brake performance (62% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (59% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.096% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.096% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.87% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.68% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (77% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.39% fail on Parking brake performance (80% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.096% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (45% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (73% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Brake linings and pads (69% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Brake pads (68% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums (70% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.77% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Lever
    • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.096% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.096% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.096% fail on Load sensing valves
  • 6.4% fail on Visibility (29% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.096% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.096% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.096% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.096% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (35% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (85% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.096% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.096% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.48% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 2.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust system (58% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.19% fail on Prop shaft
        • 0.19% fail on Joints
      • 0.096% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.096% fail on Joints
    • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.39% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.39% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.096% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on Tank
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.096% fail on Chassis
      • 0.096% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.096% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.096% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.096% fail on Body
      • 0.096% fail on Other body component
    • 0.096% fail on Load security
      • 0.096% fail on Loading door
    • 0.096% fail on Doors
      • 0.096% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.096% fail on Catch
    • 0.096% fail on Floor
    • 0.096% fail on Cabs
      • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.096% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.77% fail on Condition
      • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.096% fail on Requirements
    • 0.096% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.68% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.68% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Steering (91% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.096% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.096% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.096% fail on Steering play
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment
    • 0.096% fail on Condition