Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
70.4% pass rate
from 1,004 tests in 2020
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (50% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.90% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.100% fail on Arm
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.80% fail on Horn
      • 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.40% fail on Headlamps (88% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp (94% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.100% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp (81% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Main beam tell-tale (23 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.100% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.100% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 7.5% fail on Brakes (49% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Brake performance (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (79% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (70% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake performance (67% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.50% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.50% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2009 vans)
          • 0.100% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.90% fail on Mechanical brake components (81% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Brake linings and pads (75% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Brake pads (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums (87% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Brake discs (87% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.50% fail on Lever
    • 0.100% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 6.5% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Linkage (170% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints (86% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (64% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.100% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.100% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.100% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.100% fail on Other suspension component
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 4.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (80% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.20% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.30% fail on Spark ignition (78% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2009 vans)
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility (33% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Wipers
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (61% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on View to rear
      • 0.60% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.100% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres (33% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (85% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.100% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.100% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.100% fail on Loading door
    • 0.100% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.100% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.100% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.100% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.100% fail on Transmission
      • 0.100% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.100% fail on Joints
    • 0.100% fail on Body
      • 0.100% fail on Other body component
    • 0.100% fail on Seats
      • 0.100% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.100% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.100% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 0.70% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (69% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.40% fail on Condition
      • 0.100% fail on Attachment
      • 0.100% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.100% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Steering linkage components (95% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.100% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.100% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.100% fail on Steering play
      • 0.100% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.100% fail on Attachment
    • 0.100% fail on Hubs