Toyota Hi-Ace MOT Results
Registered in 201668.4% pass rate
from 133 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Ace is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
6.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.75% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.75% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.75% fail on Battery(ies)
-
6.8% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(8 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Brakes
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.75% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
2.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.75% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.75% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.75% fail on Brake discs
-
3.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.75% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.75% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint
- 0.75% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.5% fail on
Springs
-
0.75% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.75% fail on Leaf spring
-
0.75% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.75% fail on Coil spring
-
0.75% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.75% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.75% fail on Linkage
-
0.75% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.75% fail on Ball joint
- 0.75% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
1.5% fail on
View to rear
- 1.5% fail on Mirrors
-
3.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Transmission
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.5% fail on Joints
-
1.5% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions (88 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.75% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.75% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.0% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.0% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.75% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.75% fail on Requirements
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.75% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.75% fail on Condition