Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results

Registered in 2003
48.3% pass rate
from 662 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Brakes (25% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 12% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (44% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.15% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (47% better than other 2003 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.60% fail on Cable
        • 0.45% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.60% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.60% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.30% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.30% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamps (97% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.15% fail on Dipswitch
    • 7.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.0% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Horn (69% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Switch
    • 0.30% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.15% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Outline marker lamp
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.4% fail on Springs (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (38% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.76% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.76% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.45% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Compression ignition (96% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (75% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.15% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.15% fail on Catalytic converter
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Washers
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.60% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.60% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.30% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (35% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (54% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (47% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.60% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.30% fail on Tank
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.60% fail on Body
      • 0.60% fail on Other body component
    • 0.45% fail on Integral vehicle structure (82% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.15% fail on Bracket
    • 0.30% fail on Chassis (89% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Chassis condition (88% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
      • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.15% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.15% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.15% fail on Cabs
      • 0.15% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres (42% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
  • 5.1% fail on Steering
    • 4.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.15% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.60% fail on Power steering
      • 0.45% fail on Operation
      • 0.15% fail on Rams
      • 0.15% fail on Other components
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (80% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment