MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Astravan » 2010
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.3% pass rate
from 1,112 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.4% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.4% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Axles (26 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (40 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.45% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.27% fail on Wheel bearings (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.090% fail on Suspension rod
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Electrical equipment (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Horn (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.090% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Position lamps (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (58% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.45% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Individual direction indicators (90% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.090% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Washers (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on View to rear
      • 0.90% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.63% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.63% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.27% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.3% fail on Condition (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Size/type
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.090% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.090% fail on Linkage
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.090% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.090% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.54% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.090% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.54% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.36% fail on Rigid brake pipes (89% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.090% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.18% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.090% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.090% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.090% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 3.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.090% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.090% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.090% fail on Undertray
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (77% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (70% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.090% fail on Pipe
      • 0.090% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.090% fail on System
    • 0.27% fail on Transmission (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Drive shafts (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Boot lid (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.090% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.090% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.090% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.090% fail on Bracket
    • 0.090% fail on Body
      • 0.090% fail on Other body component
    • 0.090% fail on Seats
      • 0.090% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.99% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.99% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.90% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.090% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.090% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.090% fail on Power steering
      • 0.090% fail on Other components
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.090% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.27% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment