MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Astravan » 2010
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.4% pass rate
from 971 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (22% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Location
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (35 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Drive shafts (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Front drive shafts (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.31% fail on Front
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.72% fail on Front lamps (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Battery (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
    • 0.41% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.10% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.0% fail on Brakes (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Hub components
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.10% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.72% fail on Rear wheels (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.10% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Components (92% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Pipes
        • 0.10% fail on Hoses
    • 0.21% fail on ABS
    • 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.1% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.62% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.0% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.51% fail on System
      • 0.10% fail on Pipe
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.10% fail on Emissions
    • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.93% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Free play
        • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.10% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.21% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.62% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.41% fail on Attachment
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.51% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.31% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.51% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.31% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passengers
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers
    • 0.21% fail on Body condition