Vauxhall Astravan MOT Results
Registered in 201062.4% pass rate
from 971 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Astravan is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(22% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 9.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Location
-
5.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 4.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.31% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
-
0.62% fail on
Sub-frames
(13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (35 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Trailing arms
(4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(82% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.51% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.31% fail on Front
-
0.21% fail on
Radius arms
(6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Front suspension joints (79% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Shock absorbers
(82% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.10% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.10% fail on Condition
-
9.6% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(34% better than other 2010 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp
- 2.3% fail on Stop lamp (63% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Position lamps
(71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.72% fail on Front lamps (87% better than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Battery (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Fog lamp (71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Switch
-
0.41% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Individual lamps (88% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.10% fail on Switch
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
- 0.21% fail on Valve stem
-
7.0% fail on
Brakes
(41% better than other 2010 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
- 4.1% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.10% fail on Brake linings
-
2.2% fail on
Brake performance
(59% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.93% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.72% fail on Rear wheels (69% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Front wheels
- 0.10% fail on Brake operation
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Components
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.10% fail on Pipes
- 0.10% fail on Hoses
-
0.21% fail on
Components
(92% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.21% fail on ABS
- 0.10% fail on Restricted movement
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
-
6.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Wipers (69% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.72% fail on Mirrors
- 0.62% fail on Windscreen
-
1.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.2% fail on Registration plate
-
1.0% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.62% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.51% fail on System
- 0.10% fail on Pipe
- 0.31% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.10% fail on Emissions
- 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.62% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.93% fail on
Steering
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.72% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.51% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.10% fail on
Free play
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.10% fail on Steering rack
- 0.21% fail on Steering operation
-
0.72% fail on
Steering system
(78% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.41% fail on Attachment
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.51% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.31% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.21% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.31% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.51% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Passengers
- 0.10% fail on Drivers
- 0.21% fail on Body condition
-
0.31% fail on
Seats