Vauxhall Combo MOT Results
Registered in 200043.8% pass rate
from 425 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 2000 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Combo is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(29% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 23% fail on Registration plate lamp (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.9% fail on Front lamps
- 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp
-
0.24% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 4.7% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.71% fail on Switch
- 2.1% fail on Horn
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(61% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(61% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(61% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
22% fail on
Suspension
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(48% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 11% fail on Component mounting (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.1% fail on Spring mounting (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.0% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 4.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 3.3% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Front
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(69% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2000 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(67% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.94% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.94% fail on Condition
- 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.71% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.71% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.24% fail on Shackle bracket
-
0.24% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
(48% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
- 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Front wheels
- 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.94% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
8.9% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.5% fail on
Components
- 4.9% fail on Pipes
- 3.3% fail on Valves
- 1.4% fail on Hoses
- 0.94% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.24% fail on Leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Components
-
1.2% fail on
Hub components
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.24% fail on Brake discs
-
0.94% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.94% fail on Condition
-
0.71% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.47% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.24% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
0.24% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.24% fail on
Components
- 0.24% fail on Servos
-
0.24% fail on
Components
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(120% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 13% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.24% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
-
13% fail on
Seat belts
(150% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
13% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.8% fail on Wipers
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 1.4% fail on Mirrors
- 0.24% fail on Bonnet
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
-
12% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(42% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.1% fail on Emissions
-
2.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Cap
- 0.71% fail on Tank
- 0.47% fail on System
- 0.24% fail on Pipe
- 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(46% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 6.1% fail on Tread depth
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 1.6% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
-
8.2% fail on
Steering
-
7.3% fail on
Steering system
- 6.6% fail on Track rod end (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Ball joint
-
0.24% fail on
Free play
- 0.24% fail on Steering rack
-
0.47% fail on
Steering control
- 0.24% fail on Steering lock
- 0.24% fail on Steering column
-
0.47% fail on
Power steering
- 0.47% fail on Other components
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.24% fail on Steering operation
-
7.3% fail on
Steering system
-
5.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 3.1% fail on Body condition
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Chassis
-
0.47% fail on
Seats
- 0.47% fail on Drivers
- 0.24% fail on Speedometer
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
- 0.24% fail on Drivers
-
0.24% fail on
Load security
- 0.24% fail on Loading door
- 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Condition