Vauxhall Combo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
43.8% pass rate
from 425 tests in 2017
(13% worse than other 2000 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Combo is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (29% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 23% fail on Registration plate lamp (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 6.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.7% fail on Battery (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.71% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Horn
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.24% fail on Switch
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 11% fail on Component mounting (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Spring mounting (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 3.3% fail on Rear (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Front
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.71% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.71% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Front drive shafts (80% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.24% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.24% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.94% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.94% fail on Service brake performance (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 8.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 8.5% fail on Components
        • 4.9% fail on Pipes
        • 3.3% fail on Valves
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
      • 0.94% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.24% fail on Leaks
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.94% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.94% fail on Condition
    • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.47% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.24% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 0.24% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.24% fail on Components
        • 0.24% fail on Servos
  • 13% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Seat belts (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 13% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.24% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.24% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (42% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.1% fail on Emissions
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Cap
      • 0.71% fail on Tank
      • 0.47% fail on System
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.6% fail on Size/type (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 8.2% fail on Steering
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system
      • 6.6% fail on Track rod end (69% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Free play
        • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.47% fail on Steering control
      • 0.24% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.24% fail on Steering column
    • 0.47% fail on Power steering
      • 0.47% fail on Other components
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
    • 0.24% fail on Steering operation
  • 5.6% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.1% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 0.47% fail on Seats
      • 0.47% fail on Drivers
    • 0.24% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers
    • 0.24% fail on Load security
      • 0.24% fail on Loading door
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.6% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition