Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2004
43.4% pass rate
from 424 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 36% fail on Suspension (45% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 15% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 14% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Location
    • 11% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 11% fail on Front drive shafts (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.24% fail on Drive shafts
    • 10% fail on Anti-roll bars (56% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 5.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.71% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (93% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.0% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (46% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.47% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.9% fail on Battery
    • 0.47% fail on Horn
    • 0.47% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (41% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 13% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.71% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.1% fail on Components
        • 5.0% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 0.71% fail on Leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Parking brake
      • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 0.94% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.24% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.94% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.94% fail on Pedal
        • 0.47% fail on Condition
        • 0.47% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.47% fail on ABS
    • 0.24% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.94% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.47% fail on Mirrors
  • 13% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.94% fail on Size/type
    • 0.24% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Steering (58% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 9.7% fail on Steering system (64% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.94% fail on Free play
        • 0.94% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.71% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Steering control
      • 0.24% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.24% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.24% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.24% fail on Locking devices
  • 8.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Fuel system (150% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on System
      • 0.71% fail on Cap
      • 0.47% fail on Pipe
      • 0.24% fail on Tank
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.9% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate
  • 1.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (69% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts (87% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Prescribed areas (84% better than other 2004 vans)
  • 0.71% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (89% better than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.24% fail on Chassis
    • 0.24% fail on Body condition
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers front
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition