Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Corsavan MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.8% pass rate
from 882 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Corsavan is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Position lamp (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.45% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 9.2% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting
    • 4.4% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.79% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.45% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.45% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.34% fail on Sub-frame (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.11% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.45% fail on View to rear
      • 0.45% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Tread depth (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.57% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Brakes (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.79% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt (sp) (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Parking brake performance (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.23% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.11% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
      • 0.11% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.34% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.34% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.34% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 3.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.0% fail on Transmission (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Drive shafts (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Joints (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.45% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on Hose
    • 0.34% fail on Doors
      • 0.34% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.34% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.23% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Panel
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.11% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (44% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.45% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (79% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.23% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.5% fail on Steering (69% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.23% fail on Power steering
      • 0.11% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
    • 0.23% fail on Steering wheel (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.11% fail on Steering play
      • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.91% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.57% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.34% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
  • 0.11% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment