Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2000
44.1% pass rate
from 675 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (37% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 15% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (67% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.3% fail on Ball joint (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (91% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.5% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (200% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.44% fail on Anchor bracket (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.30% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.30% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.59% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.59% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 25% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 19% fail on Brake performance (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 12% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 12% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 8.9% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 5.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (98% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (48% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Rbt (51% worse than other 2000 vans)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.0% fail on Load sensing valves (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.89% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.89% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.74% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.59% fail on Cable
        • 0.15% fail on Rod
        • 0.15% fail on Lever
      • 0.59% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.59% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
    • 0.74% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.44% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.44% fail on Valves
    • 0.74% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.15% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.15% fail on Lever
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type (60% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 4.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 4.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.1% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Horn (67% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.15% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.74% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.59% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure (33% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system (71% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Transmission (59% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.7% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
    • 5.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (70% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (64% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 0.15% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 3.6% fail on Chassis
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.9% fail on Body
      • 1.5% fail on Panel (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Other body component
    • 0.59% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.59% fail on Doors
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
        • 0.15% fail on Hinge
      • 0.15% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
    • 0.59% fail on Seats
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.44% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.15% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.15% fail on System
    • 0.44% fail on Cabs
      • 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar
      • 0.15% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.15% fail on Load security
      • 0.15% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.15% fail on Tailgate condition
      • 0.15% fail on Loading door
  • 18% fail on Visibility (75% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 12% fail on Washers (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Bonnet (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on View to rear
      • 0.30% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Steering (85% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.5% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 9.5% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.89% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Power steering
      • 0.30% fail on Operation
    • 0.30% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.30% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 4.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Fluid leaks (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (170% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Other leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (74% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Attachment
    • 0.15% fail on Hubs
  • 0.15% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.15% fail on Speedometer