Vauxhall Movano MOT Results
Registered in 201054.8% pass rate
from 1,094 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(23% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
9.7% fail on
Position lamps
(37% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 7.6% fail on Front lamps (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.37% fail on All position lamps
-
6.3% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Individual lamps (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.91% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
6.3% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Headlamps
(77% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.1% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Switch
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2010 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.27% fail on Tell tale
- 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Hazard warning
(2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Lamp
- 0.64% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.46% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
20% fail on
Suspension
(50% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.37% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
(6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Front drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(64% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Attachment
- 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(110% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Rear
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.82% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Attachment
- 0.091% fail on Linkage condition
-
0.82% fail on
Leaf springs
-
0.46% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 0.27% fail on Shackle
- 0.18% fail on Anchor
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.091% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.091% fail on Securing bolts
-
0.46% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
0.27% fail on
Axles
(14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Clearance (30 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
0.091% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.091% fail on Condition
-
0.091% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.091% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.091% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.091% fail on Condition
-
0.091% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.091% fail on Condition
-
0.091% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.091% fail on Condition
-
0.091% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.091% fail on Spring mounting
-
12% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(58% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 9.9% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 5.7% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels
- 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Hub components
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.91% fail on Brake discs
-
2.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
2.2% fail on
Components
- 1.2% fail on Pipes
- 1.0% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Operation
-
2.2% fail on
Components
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake
(92% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Condition (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
- 0.73% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.27% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
- 0.64% fail on ABS
-
0.37% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.27% fail on Cable
- 0.091% fail on Lever
- 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
10.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.2% fail on Washers
- 3.8% fail on Wipers
- 1.6% fail on Windscreen
- 1.3% fail on Mirrors
- 0.37% fail on Bonnet
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 2.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
- 0.091% fail on Valve stem
-
2.5% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(92% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(180% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.82% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.82% fail on Condition
-
1.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(180% worse than other 2010 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(90% worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Body condition
-
0.64% fail on
Doors
- 0.27% fail on Drivers
- 0.27% fail on Passengers front
- 0.091% fail on Passengers other
-
0.37% fail on
Seats
- 0.27% fail on Passengers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Drivers
-
0.27% fail on
Load security
(6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Loading door (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
- 0.091% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.091% fail on Body security
- 0.091% fail on Spare wheel
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
(59% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.91% fail on
Power steering
- 0.46% fail on Operation
- 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.18% fail on Other components
-
0.73% fail on
Steering system
(77% better than other 2010 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.18% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
-
0.091% fail on
Free play
- 0.091% fail on Steering rack
-
0.091% fail on
Other components
- 0.091% fail on Steering component
- 0.18% fail on Steering operation
-
0.091% fail on
Steering control
-
0.091% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.091% fail on Universal joint
-
0.091% fail on
Steering coupling
-
0.91% fail on
Power steering
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate
-
0.91% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.46% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.46% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.27% fail on Cap
- 0.091% fail on Tank
- 0.091% fail on System
-
0.091% fail on
Towbars
- 0.091% fail on Towbar