Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.8% pass rate
from 1,094 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 7.6% fail on Front lamps (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.37% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.3% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.2% fail on Individual lamps (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.27% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.2% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Lamp
    • 0.64% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.46% fail on Trailer electrical socket (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Suspension (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 12% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 12% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Drive shafts (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment
    • 2.6% fail on Front suspension joints (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Front (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment
      • 0.091% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.82% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.46% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.27% fail on Shackle
        • 0.18% fail on Anchor
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.091% fail on Anchor bracket
      • 0.091% fail on Securing bolts
    • 0.27% fail on Axles (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Clearance (30 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.091% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.091% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.091% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.091% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.091% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.091% fail on Condition
    • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.091% fail on Spring mounting
  • 19% fail on Brakes (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.9% fail on Parking brake performance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Rear wheels (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.4% fail on Hub components
      • 4.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake calipers (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.2% fail on Components
        • 1.2% fail on Pipes
        • 1.0% fail on Hoses (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Leaks (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Operation
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.0% fail on Pedal
        • 0.73% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.64% fail on ABS
    • 0.37% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.27% fail on Cable
      • 0.091% fail on Lever
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
  • 10.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.2% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.37% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.091% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.82% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.82% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Body condition
    • 0.64% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Drivers
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.091% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.37% fail on Seats
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Drivers
    • 0.27% fail on Load security (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Loading door (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.091% fail on Body security
    • 0.091% fail on Spare wheel
  • 1.6% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.91% fail on Power steering
      • 0.46% fail on Operation
      • 0.37% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Other components
    • 0.73% fail on Steering system (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Free play
        • 0.091% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
        • 0.091% fail on Steering component
    • 0.18% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.091% fail on Steering control
      • 0.091% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.091% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.91% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.46% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.46% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Cap
      • 0.091% fail on Tank
      • 0.091% fail on System
  • 0.091% fail on Towbars
    • 0.091% fail on Towbar