MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Movano » 2010
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2010
52.7% pass rate
from 1,249 tests in 2020
(11% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (25% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.5% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Position lamp (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.080% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.9% fail on Outline marker lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Outline marker lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on All outline marker lamps (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.88% fail on Rear reflectors (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.080% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 22% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 16% fail on Brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 5.7% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.88% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.080% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.080% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.080% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.080% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.88% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.40% fail on Cable
        • 0.40% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.080% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.56% fail on Pedal
    • 0.48% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.48% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.4% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 9.0% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Flexible couplings (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 0.96% fail on Doors (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Driver's door (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.56% fail on Body
      • 0.48% fail on Other body component
      • 0.080% fail on Panel
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on System
      • 0.080% fail on Pipe
    • 0.24% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Undertray (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.16% fail on Carrier
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.080% fail on Towbar
      • 0.080% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.080% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.080% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (91% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.64% fail on Linkage ball joints (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.64% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.24% fail on Leaf spring (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Shackle bracket (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.080% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.080% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.080% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.64% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.24% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.080% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.080% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.080% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.080% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
  • 10% fail on Visibility (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 1.3% fail on View to rear
      • 1.3% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.080% fail on Window
    • 0.32% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.8% fail on Tyres
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.32% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
    • 0.48% fail on Steering linkage components (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.24% fail on Steering coupling (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.080% fail on Flexible coupling
    • 0.24% fail on Steering play
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.080% fail on Steering column
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.64% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
    • 0.080% fail on Airbags
      • 0.080% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (67% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (56% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.080% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.080% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.56% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.080% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.56% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.40% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.080% fail on Other leaks
  • 0.56% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plates