MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Vauxhall » Movano » 2010

Vauxhall Movano MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.2% pass rate
from 1,143 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Vauxhall Movano is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.9% fail on Direction indicators (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Flashing type (70% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Hazard warning (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
      • 0.17% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.96% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.087% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 21% fail on Brakes (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Parking brake performance (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.70% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.087% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (73% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.79% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.087% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.96% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Cable
        • 0.35% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Pivot
    • 2.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.87% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.70% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.61% fail on Lever
    • 0.26% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.26% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.087% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.087% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.087% fail on Valves
    • 0.26% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.087% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.087% fail on Servos
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Front passenger's door (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Door condition (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.087% fail on Hinge
      • 0.44% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
        • 0.087% fail on Hinge
    • 1.0% fail on Body (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Other body component (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Panel
    • 0.79% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.26% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.17% fail on Tank
      • 0.087% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.26% fail on Load security (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Dropside (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Other dropside component (50 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Loading door
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.087% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.26% fail on Undertray (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.087% fail on Towbar
      • 0.087% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.087% fail on Floor
  • 11% fail on Visibility (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.87% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on View to rear
      • 0.87% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.61% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.61% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint (48% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.44% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.087% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.79% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Leaf springs (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.087% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.087% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.087% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.35% fail on Coil springs (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Coil spring (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.087% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.35% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (71% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.087% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.087% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.087% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (62% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
    • 0.087% fail on Airbags
      • 0.087% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.35% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.79% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.35% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.087% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.087% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Operation
    • 0.96% fail on Steering linkage components (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Track rod end (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.61% fail on Power steering
      • 0.35% fail on Operation
      • 0.26% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.79% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.087% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.087% fail on Doors
      • 0.087% fail on Emergency exits