Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results

Registered in 1988
63.2% pass rate
from 413 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 1988 vans)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1988 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (30% better than other 1988 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.4% fail on Horn
      • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (57% better than other 1988 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (57% better than other 1988 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 1.2% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.73% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.73% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators (86% better than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type (86% better than other 1988 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators
  • 11% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.24% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (60% better than other 1988 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.24% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.97% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.73% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.24% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Pedal
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.48% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.24% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
  • 9.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Panel
    • 0.73% fail on Chassis
      • 0.73% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.73% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.73% fail on Seats
      • 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.24% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Hose
      • 0.24% fail on Pipe
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission (80% better than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.24% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.24% fail on Joints
    • 0.24% fail on Towbar
      • 0.24% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.24% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Bracket
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition
  • 8.7% fail on Suspension (38% better than other 1988 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (53% better than other 1988 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.73% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.73% fail on Springs
      • 0.73% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.73% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.0% fail on Visibility
    • 4.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.8% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.24% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 3.9% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.73% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.24% fail on Steering column
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres
    • 1.9% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 0.97% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (72% better than other 1988 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Seat belts (72% better than other 1988 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.73% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.48% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.24% fail on Vehicle Identification Number