Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 199551.6% pass rate
from 318 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 8.2% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 5.3% fail on Headlamp
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.31% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 4.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
4.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.4% fail on Fog lamp
-
4.1% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.5% fail on Front lamps
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.3% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Battery
- 0.94% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.63% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.31% fail on Lamp
- 0.31% fail on Switch
- 0.31% fail on Electrical wiring
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
- 8.2% fail on Front wheels
- 6.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.31% fail on Brake operation
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(67% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
12% fail on
Components
(76% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Hoses (140% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Valves (190% worse than other 1995 vans)
- 4.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.31% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.31% fail on Operation
- 0.31% fail on Leaks
-
12% fail on
Components
(76% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical components
(4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Cable (5 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
0.63% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.63% fail on
Pedal
- 0.63% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.63% fail on
Pedal
- 0.63% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.31% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.31% fail on Leaks
-
0.31% fail on
Hub components
- 0.31% fail on Brake pads
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
-
19% fail on
Suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(53% better than other 1995 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Component mounting
- 0.31% fail on Subframe mounting
-
5.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 4.4% fail on Front suspension joints (100% worse than other 1995 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.5% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.5% fail on Condition
-
2.2% fail on
Drive shafts
-
2.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 2.2% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
2.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Location
-
1.3% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.63% fail on Front
- 0.63% fail on Rear
-
5.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(53% better than other 1995 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Steering
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
- 4.1% fail on Steering rack
- 4.1% fail on Track rod end
- 0.31% fail on Drag link end
- 0.31% fail on Steering arm
-
1.6% fail on
Power steering
- 0.63% fail on Operation
- 0.31% fail on Drive system
- 0.31% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.31% fail on Other components
- 0.63% fail on Steering operation
-
0.31% fail on
Steering control
- 0.31% fail on Steering column
-
8.5% fail on
Steering system
-
9.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 6.0% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.94% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.63% fail on System
- 0.31% fail on Hose
-
9.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.9% fail on Wipers
- 2.2% fail on Washers
- 0.94% fail on Windscreen
- 0.94% fail on Mirrors
- 0.31% fail on Bonnet
-
6.6% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 0.63% fail on Valve stem
-
6.6% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
2.8% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Passengers front (4 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 1995 vans)
- 0.31% fail on Drivers
- 2.5% fail on Body condition
-
1.6% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Chassis
-
1.3% fail on
Seats
- 0.94% fail on Passengers
- 0.94% fail on Drivers
- 0.31% fail on Speedometer
-
2.8% fail on
Doors
(3 times worse than other 1995 vans)
-
5.0% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 4.4% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.63% fail on Requirements
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
5.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.6% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate
-
0.31% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.31% fail on Attachment