Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 199650.6% pass rate
from 340 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
-
6.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.59% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.59% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 2.6% fail on Horn
- 0.59% fail on Battery(ies)
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.88% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.59% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.29% fail on All position lamps
- 0.29% fail on Position lamp
-
0.59% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.59% fail on Switch
-
0.59% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
7.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
21% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(60% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
9.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(60% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
5.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.5% fail on
Rbt
-
3.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.2% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.29% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(58% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 2.1% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
-
0.59% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.59% fail on Brake pads
-
0.59% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.59% fail on Brake discs
-
2.1% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 2.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (190% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Load sensing valves
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.88% fail on Pedal
- 0.29% fail on Hand lever
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.59% fail on Lever
-
0.59% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.59% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.29% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.29% fail on Servos
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.4% fail on
Chassis
- 4.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
-
4.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.1% fail on Joints
-
4.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.5% fail on
Body
- 1.2% fail on Other body component (2 times worse than other 1996 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Panel
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.59% fail on Pipe
- 0.29% fail on Tank
- 0.29% fail on Hose
-
0.88% fail on
Doors
-
0.59% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.59% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.59% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
-
0.29% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat
-
17% fail on
Suspension
- 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.8% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.2% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.29% fail on Linkage
- 0.29% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.88% fail on Coil spring
- 0.29% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
0.88% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.88% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.88% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.59% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.59% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 5.9% fail on Washers
- 4.1% fail on Wipers
- 0.59% fail on Bonnet
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
8.5% fail on
Steering
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.2% fail on Track rod end
-
1.5% fail on
Power steering
- 0.88% fail on Operation
- 0.88% fail on Other components
-
0.88% fail on
Steering play
- 0.88% fail on Steering rack
-
3.8% fail on
Steering gear
-
8.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(71% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
6.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 1996 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.29% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.29% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(140% worse than other 1996 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.8% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.29% fail on Other leaks
-
6.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.59% fail on Requirements
- 0.29% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.5% fail on
Tyres
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 1.8% fail on Tread depth
-
1.8% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.29% fail on Anchorages