MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caravelle » 2000
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results

Registered in 2000
52.7% pass rate
from 564 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.9% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Horn
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Headlamps (87% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Battery (83% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Pipes
        • 3.0% fail on Valves
        • 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.18% fail on Servos
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.18% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.6% fail on Mechanical components (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.18% fail on Rod
    • 0.53% fail on ABS
    • 0.35% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.35% fail on Condition
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
        • 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.35% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
    • 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 15% fail on Suspension (35% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Subframe mounting (83% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.89% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.53% fail on Front
      • 0.35% fail on Rear
  • 10% fail on Steering
    • 8.2% fail on Steering system
      • 5.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 3.5% fail on Steering rack (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering
      • 0.53% fail on Operation
      • 0.53% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.35% fail on Other components
    • 0.35% fail on Steering control
      • 0.35% fail on Steering column
    • 0.35% fail on Steering operation
  • 8.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.89% fail on Emissions
    • 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
  • 7.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.35% fail on Size/type
  • 6.7% fail on Driver's view of the road (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.53% fail on Windscreen
  • 4.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Doors (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Drivers
      • 0.71% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.71% fail on Passengers other
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Seats
      • 0.53% fail on Passengers
      • 0.35% fail on Drivers
    • 0.53% fail on Vehicle structure (79% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.53% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (51% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.71% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.35% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars
    • 0.18% fail on Towbar