Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 200052.7% pass rate
from 564 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
5.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.0% fail on Front lamps
- 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.7% fail on Horn
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.53% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(58% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Fog lamp (57% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamps
(87% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Battery (83% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
22% fail on
Brakes
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.9% fail on Service brake performance (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Rear wheels
- 4.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 2.7% fail on Front wheels
- 0.35% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.18% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
11% fail on
Components
- 5.3% fail on Hoses (160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 3.4% fail on Pipes
- 3.0% fail on Valves
- 0.18% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.18% fail on Servos
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.18% fail on Operation
-
11% fail on
Components
-
2.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 0.71% fail on Brake discs
- 0.18% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical components
(160% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Cable (180% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Linkage
- 0.18% fail on Rod
- 0.53% fail on ABS
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.35% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
-
0.35% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Leaks
- 0.35% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.18% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.18% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
12% fail on
Brake performance
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(35% better than other 2000 vans)
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.18% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
-
4.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
2.3% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.3% fail on Condition
-
2.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(79% better than other 2000 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Subframe mounting (83% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.89% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
1.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.53% fail on Front
- 0.35% fail on Rear
-
4.8% fail on
Drive shafts
-
10% fail on
Steering
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
- 5.3% fail on Track rod end
- 3.5% fail on Steering rack (97% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Steering arm
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
- 0.53% fail on Operation
- 0.53% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.35% fail on Other components
-
0.35% fail on
Steering control
- 0.35% fail on Steering column
- 0.35% fail on Steering operation
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
-
8.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.89% fail on Emissions
- 0.71% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Pipe
-
7.1% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 0.35% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(42% better than other 2000 vans)
- 3.2% fail on Washers
- 3.0% fail on Wipers (52% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Mirrors
- 0.53% fail on Windscreen
-
4.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(42% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Doors
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Drivers
- 0.71% fail on Passengers front
- 0.71% fail on Passengers other
- 1.8% fail on Body condition (60% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.89% fail on
Seats
- 0.53% fail on Passengers
- 0.35% fail on Drivers
-
0.53% fail on
Vehicle structure
(79% better than other 2000 vans)
- 0.53% fail on Chassis (79% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Doors
(130% worse than other 2000 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(51% better than other 2000 vans)
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
(49% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas (65% better than other 2000 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
0.18% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.18% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
(49% better than other 2000 vans)
-
0.71% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.71% fail on Registration plate
-
0.35% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Towbars
- 0.18% fail on Towbar