Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 200455.6% pass rate
from 475 tests in 2017
(13% better than other 2004 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
27% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 12% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.5% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.21% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.42% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.21% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.21% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.8% fail on Stop lamp (49% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.1% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(67% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (66% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.42% fail on Horn (80% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Battery
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(26% better than other 2004 vans)
-
6.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 5.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 2.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
2.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
0.84% fail on
Drive shafts
(81% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Constant velocity joints (80% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.84% fail on
Front drive shafts
(81% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.42% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.42% fail on
Wheel bearings
(82% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Front
- 0.21% fail on Rear
-
0.21% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
6.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
10% fail on
Brakes
(50% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(60% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (50% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Front wheels (67% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.42% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(49% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.4% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Hoses (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Reservoirs
-
4.4% fail on
Components
(45% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs
- 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.42% fail on ABS
-
0.21% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.21% fail on Condition
-
0.21% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.21% fail on Cable
-
0.21% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.21% fail on
Components
- 0.21% fail on Servos
-
0.21% fail on
Components
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(60% better than other 2004 vans)
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth (59% better than other 2004 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.6% fail on Track rod end
- 0.42% fail on Steering rack
- 0.21% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Steering operation
-
0.21% fail on
Power steering
- 0.21% fail on Operation
-
4.2% fail on
Steering system
-
4.4% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(63% better than other 2004 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Wipers (67% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Windscreen
- 0.84% fail on Washers (82% better than other 2004 vans)
- 0.84% fail on Mirrors
-
2.7% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(57% better than other 2004 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Drivers (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Passengers front
-
0.21% fail on
Seats
- 0.21% fail on Passengers
-
2.5% fail on
Doors
(2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(70% better than other 2004 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Emissions
- 0.42% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2004 vans)
-
0.21% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.21% fail on Cap
- 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(69% better than other 2004 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.5% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.21% fail on Attachment
-
1.7% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.84% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.84% fail on Registration plate