Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 200957.7% pass rate
from 426 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
-
7.3% fail on
Springs
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 7.3% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
7.3% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.70% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.47% fail on Ball joint
- 0.23% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.23% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
7.3% fail on
Springs
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(31% better than other 2009 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.94% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.94% fail on Stop lamp (85% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.47% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.47% fail on Horn
-
0.23% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Washers
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
-
0.70% fail on
View to rear
- 0.70% fail on Mirrors
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet
-
5.6% fail on
Brakes
(63% better than other 2009 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.23% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.70% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Brake pads (74% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.47% fail on Brake discs
-
0.70% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.23% fail on Pedal
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.23% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.23% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
-
2.8% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2009 vans)
-
5.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
-
4.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 2.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.47% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.23% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.47% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.23% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.47% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.47% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(57% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.47% fail on Door condition
-
1.2% fail on
Driver's door
(6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.70% fail on
Transmission
(83% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.70% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.70% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.70% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
Body
- 0.47% fail on Other body component
-
0.23% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.23% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.23% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.23% fail on Carrier
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(190% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end (63% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Ball joint
-
0.70% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.70% fail on Steering rack
-
0.70% fail on
Power steering
- 0.70% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.47% fail on
Steering play
- 0.47% fail on Steering rack
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.94% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.47% fail on
Airbags
(12 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.47% fail on Drivers airbag (14 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.23% fail on Condition
-
0.47% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.47% fail on Registration plates