MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Volkswagen » Caravelle » 2010

Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.7% pass rate
from 630 tests in 2020
(26% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 5.2% fail on Springs
      • 5.2% fail on Coil springs (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (51% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Position lamps (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Position lamp (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.32% fail on Stop lamp (95% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.16% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Tread depth (62% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.5% fail on Brakes (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.63% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.95% fail on Brake performance (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.63% fail on Rbt
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.16% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 2.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (76% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Doors
      • 0.63% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Door condition (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Drive shafts (85% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Joints (85% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Driver's seat
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.48% fail on Condition
  • 0.63% fail on Steering (87% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.32% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.32% fail on Steering linkage components (92% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Track rod end (91% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates