Volkswagen Caravelle MOT Results
Registered in 201677.0% pass rate
from 1,037 tests in 2021
(21% better than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Volkswagen Caravelle is unusually good or bad.
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension
(38% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
(130% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.39% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.39% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.19% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.096% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.096% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.096% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.1% fail on
Springs
(100% worse than other 2016 vans)
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Condition (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.096% fail on Size/type
-
3.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(67% better than other 2016 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(54% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim (54% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.096% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.58% fail on
Headlamps
(70% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (20 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.096% fail on Headlamp
- 0.096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.48% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.19% fail on Horn
- 0.096% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.29% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Direction indicators
(80% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.29% fail on
Flashing type
(80% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.096% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.096% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
(54% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
(57% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.1% fail on Brake pads
-
0.48% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.48% fail on Brake discs
-
0.096% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.096% fail on Cable
-
2.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.29% fail on
Brake performance
(89% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.096% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
- 0.096% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
-
0.096% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.096% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
- 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(82% better than other 2016 vans)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Visibility
(64% better than other 2016 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Wipers (55% better than other 2016 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Washers (74% better than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.29% fail on Mirrors
-
0.096% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.096% fail on Windscreen
-
1.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.58% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.58% fail on
Transmission
-
0.58% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.58% fail on Joints
-
0.58% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.29% fail on
Doors
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.29% fail on Door condition (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
(4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.19% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(17 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (21 times worse than other 2016 vans)
-
0.096% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.096% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Emission control equipment
(7 times worse than other 2016 vans)
- 0.096% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
- 0.096% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.096% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.29% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.48% fail on
Steering
-
0.19% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.19% fail on Steering rack
-
0.19% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.19% fail on Track rod end
-
0.096% fail on
Power steering
- 0.096% fail on Operation
-
0.19% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.39% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.39% fail on Registration plates
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.29% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.19% fail on Attachment