MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Daihatsu » Extol » 2005
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Daihatsu Extol MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.9% pass rate
from 192 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Daihatsu Extol is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.0% fail on Axles (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Axle
      • 0.52% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Springs
      • 1.0% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 9.9% fail on Exhaust system (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Chassis
      • 3.1% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.52% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.52% fail on Carrier
    • 0.52% fail on Body
      • 0.52% fail on Other body component
    • 0.52% fail on Seats
      • 0.52% fail on Driver's seat
  • 14% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (17 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (28 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Emissions not tested (31 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.52% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.52% fail on View to rear
      • 0.52% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.52% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.52% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.52% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (56% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.0% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 4.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 2.1% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.1% fail on Track rod end
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.52% fail on Attachment