MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Ford » Transit » 2002
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Ford Transit MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.7% pass rate
from 14,848 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Ford Transit is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms (22% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint (35% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.0% fail on Springs (15% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.77% fail on Leaf spring (83% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.088% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.081% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.074% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.047% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 0.0067% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.87% fail on Coil springs (50% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Coil spring (51% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on Mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.99% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage (76% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints (77% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.061% fail on Ball joint (82% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (85% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Sub-frame (87% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Other suspension component (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint dust cover (96% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.074% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.094% fail on Macpherson strut (73% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.013% fail on Macpherson strut (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.054% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0067% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0067% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0067% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.0067% fail on Axles
      • 0.0067% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (4.5% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (8.6% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (40% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamp aim (12% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (13% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (20% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (20% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (21% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Switch (70% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0067% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp (10% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.013% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.013% fail on Dipswitch (82% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.9% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.11% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0067% fail on Switch
    • 4.0% fail on Electrical equipment (25% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Horn (61% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Battery(ies) (86% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators (38% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type (38% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (46% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Side repeaters (31% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0067% fail on Switch
      • 0.0067% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.0067% fail on Arm
    • 0.81% fail on Outline marker lamps (92% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Outline marker lamp (90% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on All outline marker lamps
    • 0.31% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.31% fail on Switch
    • 0.094% fail on Rear reflectors (75% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.054% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0067% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0067% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (6.5% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 6.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (12% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (79% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Service brake performance (20% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (20% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0067% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 6.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 5.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (31% worse than other 2002 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.061% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.25% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.034% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.027% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0067% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.013% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (18% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (17% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.054% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs (20% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (46% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Cable (45% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.054% fail on Lever
        • 0.013% fail on Pivot
        • 0.0067% fail on Relay lever
    • 2.4% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.1% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Prescribed areas (190% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Other braking system component (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.094% fail on Actuating linkage mounting (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
      • 0.027% fail on Other components
      • 0.0067% fail on Additional braking device
    • 0.92% fail on Parking brake control (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Lever (36% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.77% fail on Pedal (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.45% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.18% fail on Valves
      • 0.081% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.0067% fail on Servos
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (69% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.0067% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0067% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.0067% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0067% fail on Servos
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Chassis (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 7.0% fail on Chassis condition (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Strengthening plate (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (93% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.027% fail on Sub-frame condition
        • 0.0067% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.027% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission (12% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Prop shafts (170% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Bearing housing (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on Flexible couplings (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Joints
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Joints (73% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Drive shaft
    • 2.0% fail on Body (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Panel (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Other body component (69% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Body condition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.0067% fail on Pillar
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system (55% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (65% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.73% fail on Front passenger's door (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Door condition (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.013% fail on Catch
      • 0.54% fail on Driver's door (64% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.46% fail on Door condition (58% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Hinge
        • 0.027% fail on Catch
        • 0.0067% fail on Pillar
      • 0.35% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.31% fail on Door condition
        • 0.034% fail on Catch
        • 0.0067% fail on Hinge
    • 1.3% fail on Fuel system (24% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (95% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Tank (49% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on System
      • 0.067% fail on Pipe (65% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Hose
    • 0.76% fail on Bumpers (86% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Towbar (51% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Vehicle structure (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.094% fail on Other towbar components
      • 0.020% fail on Safety device
      • 0.013% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.55% fail on Seats (37% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Driver's seat (52% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.51% fail on Cabs (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Steps (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.37% fail on Floor (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Load security (140% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Dropside (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Dropside condition (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Other dropside component (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.0067% fail on Pillar
      • 0.081% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.040% fail on Tailgate condition
        • 0.013% fail on Other tailgate component
      • 0.067% fail on Loading door
      • 0.0067% fail on Access panel
    • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.094% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.088% fail on Bracket (120% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Spare wheel (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Carrier (75% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.013% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.0067% fail on Undertray
  • 12% fail on Visibility (11% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers (16% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Washers (15% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear (70% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors (72% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 1.0% fail on Condition of glass (88% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.98% fail on Windscreen (86% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Window
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet (65% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Driver's view
  • 7.6% fail on Steering (9.8% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.2% fail on Steering linkage components (29% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Track rod end (38% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.061% fail on Drag link end (60% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.027% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.1% fail on Power steering (57% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Pipes and hoses (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Other components (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.054% fail on Pump
      • 0.027% fail on Rams
    • 0.51% fail on Steering gear (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering rack (64% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
      • 0.0067% fail on Steering box
    • 0.088% fail on Steering play (69% better than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack (63% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.027% fail on Steering column
    • 0.027% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.027% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0067% fail on Steering wheel
  • 6.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Seat belts (80% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Prescribed areas (110% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0067% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.67% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Airbags
      • 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (13% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.30% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 2.9% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (28% worse than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (61% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.074% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (76% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.013% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.013% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0067% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
      • 0.36% fail on Spark ignition (59% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions (46% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.081% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.074% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (79% better than other 2002 vans)
        • 0.013% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks (45% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (60% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (130% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0067% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0067% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.067% fail on Vehicle Identification Number (180% worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.47% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment (59% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Hubs
  • 0.14% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests (160% worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Doors (150% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Emergency exits (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
    • 0.061% fail on Steps and stairs (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Steps (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 0.061% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.054% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.0067% fail on Speed limiter
      • 0.0067% fail on Speed limiter plate
  • 0.040% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.034% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.0067% fail on Belt(s)/padding