MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Nissan » Primastar » 2002

Nissan Primastar MOT Results

Registered in 2002
39.0% pass rate
from 59 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 vans and highlighted areas where the Nissan Primastar is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Anti-roll bars (200% worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 8.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (8 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 10% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 3.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 1.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 12% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 5.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Decelerometer
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Other components
  • 20% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 17% fail on Steering linkage components (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 15% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2002 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Drag link end
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
    • 1.7% fail on Steering wheel
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.7% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 1.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.7% fail on Horn
  • 15% fail on Visibility
    • 8.5% fail on Wipers
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on View to rear
      • 1.7% fail on Mirrors
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission
      • 6.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 6.8% fail on Joints
    • 5.1% fail on Chassis
      • 3.4% fail on Chassis condition
      • 1.7% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Tank
  • 5.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plates (3 times worse than other 2002 vans)
  • 5.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.7% fail on Condition