MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 1999
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 1999
60.2% pass rate
from 128 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.1% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.78% fail on Switch
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.78% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 13% fail on Exhaust emissions (170% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 11% fail on Catalyst emissions (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.78% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.78% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.78% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 8.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.9% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 0.78% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.78% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.78% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.78% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 6.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.78% fail on Chassis
      • 0.78% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.78% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.78% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.78% fail on Towbar
      • 0.78% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes
    • 3.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.1% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.6% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (20 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.78% fail on Lever
    • 0.78% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.78% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.78% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.78% fail on Other braking system component
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.9% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
  • 3.1% fail on Visibility (67% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Wipers
    • 1.6% fail on Washers
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.3% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.78% fail on Operation
    • 0.78% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.78% fail on Universal joint
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates