Suzuki Carry MOT Results
Registered in 199949.4% pass rate
from 87 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
- 16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.6% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.1% fail on Coil spring
-
1.1% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.1% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.1% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
17% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (14 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 2.3% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(11 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
5.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 2.3% fail on Position lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.1% fail on Horn
-
5.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
5.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 6.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.1% fail on
Chassis
- 1.1% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.1% fail on
Transmission
-
1.1% fail on
Prop shafts
- 1.1% fail on Joints
-
1.1% fail on
Prop shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Doors
-
1.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.1% fail on Door condition
-
1.1% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 1.1% fail on Floor
-
1.1% fail on
Cabs
- 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.9% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
6.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Condition
- 3.4% fail on Tread depth
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
-
1.1% fail on
Condition of glass
- 1.1% fail on Windscreen
-
3.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.3% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
2.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.3% fail on
Steering
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.1% fail on Drag link end
-
1.1% fail on
Steering play
- 1.1% fail on Steering rack
-
1.1% fail on
Steering linkage components