Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 1999
58.6% pass rate
from 169 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 13% fail on Component mounting (81% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 4.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.59% fail on Front
      • 0.59% fail on Rear
    • 0.59% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.59% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.59% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.59% fail on Universal joint
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.59% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.59% fail on Battery
    • 0.59% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.59% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.59% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.1% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.59% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.59% fail on Cap
  • 9.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Bonnet (10 times worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 8.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 3.6% fail on Chassis
    • 3.6% fail on Body condition
    • 1.8% fail on Doors
      • 1.2% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.59% fail on Passengers front
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.59% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.9% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.59% fail on Free play
        • 0.59% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.59% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Steering control (6 times worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering coupling (13 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Flexible coupling
        • 0.59% fail on Universal joint
    • 1.2% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 5.3% fail on Brakes (74% better than other 1999 vans)
    • 3.0% fail on Hydraulic systems (68% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Components (73% better than other 1999 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes
      • 0.59% fail on Leaks
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (76% better than other 1999 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance
    • 1.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  • 3.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.59% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.59% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.59% fail on Prescribed areas