MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2000

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2000
57.7% pass rate
from 274 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 8.8% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Springs
      • 0.73% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.36% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.36% fail on Mounting
      • 0.36% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.36% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.36% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.36% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.36% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 16% fail on Exhaust emissions (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 16% fail on Spark ignition (13 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 13% fail on Catalyst emissions (16 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Emissions not tested (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (25 times worse than other 2000 vans)
  • 12% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.36% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.1% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.2% fail on Chassis
      • 2.2% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.73% fail on Boot lid (21 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.36% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.73% fail on Cabs
      • 0.73% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.36% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.36% fail on Carrier
    • 0.36% fail on Towbar
      • 0.36% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.36% fail on Transmission
      • 0.36% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.36% fail on Joints
    • 0.36% fail on Body
      • 0.36% fail on Body condition
    • 0.36% fail on Load security
      • 0.36% fail on Loading door
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.36% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.1% fail on Visibility
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.36% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.36% fail on Windscreen
  • 8.0% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Brake performance (58% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (70% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (69% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (69% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (80% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt
          • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.36% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.36% fail on Cable
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.36% fail on Pedal
      • 0.36% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.36% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.36% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.36% fail on Other braking system component
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
  • 2.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Steering (73% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.73% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.36% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates