Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2000
50.5% pass rate
from 418 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas (44% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Component mounting (110% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Spring mounting
      • 0.24% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.72% fail on Trailing arms (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.72% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.48% fail on Front
      • 0.24% fail on Rear
    • 0.24% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 19% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (120% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 13% fail on Emissions (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 7.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.48% fail on Cap
  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.6% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.24% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.96% fail on Horn
    • 0.24% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Tyres (55% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Tread depth (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.48% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (60% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Components (62% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.6% fail on Pipes (51% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
      • 0.48% fail on Leaks
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.24% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.24% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.24% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.72% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.72% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.24% fail on Cable
    • 0.24% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.4% fail on Driver's view of the road (37% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers
    • 2.2% fail on Washers (55% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 2.9% fail on Body condition
    • 2.6% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Chassis
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.24% fail on Passengers other
  • 3.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.96% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.24% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Steering control (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Steering coupling (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.72% fail on Universal joint (9 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Steering column
    • 0.96% fail on Steering system (85% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.24% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.72% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
  • 0.24% fail on Towbars
    • 0.24% fail on Vehicle structure