MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2005

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2005
56.8% pass rate
from 1,265 tests in 2021
(10% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Suspension (16% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 7.4% fail on Ball joint (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Springs (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (51% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.40% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
        • 0.16% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.079% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
      • 0.24% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.079% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings (64% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.63% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.24% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.079% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.079% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (35% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.079% fail on Switch
    • 2.1% fail on Direction indicators (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Flashing type (43% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.079% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.79% fail on Electrical equipment (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Horn
      • 0.079% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.079% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.079% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (15 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (20 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Non catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition (87% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.079% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.16% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.079% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 10% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Exhaust system (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.3% fail on Chassis
      • 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.40% fail on Body
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
      • 0.079% fail on Body condition
      • 0.079% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.079% fail on Panel
    • 0.32% fail on Boot lid (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Boot lid condition (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.24% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.079% fail on Tank
    • 0.24% fail on Cabs
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.16% fail on Transmission (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Prop shafts (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Prop shaft
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.079% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.079% fail on Bracket
    • 0.16% fail on Floor
    • 0.079% fail on Doors
      • 0.079% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.079% fail on Door condition
    • 0.079% fail on Seats
      • 0.079% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 9.9% fail on Brakes (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance (51% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (53% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.079% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.079% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on Rbt (58% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (72% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.079% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.079% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.32% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.16% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.16% fail on Other braking system component
    • 0.079% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.079% fail on Brake fluid
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Tread depth (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Condition (46% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 7.6% fail on Visibility (25% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.079% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.63% fail on Condition
      • 0.079% fail on Attachment
    • 0.32% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Track rod end (96% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.079% fail on Other components
        • 0.079% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.079% fail on Operation
      • 0.079% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.16% fail on Steering play
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.079% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.71% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.71% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.079% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.079% fail on Belt(s)/padding