MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Suzuki » Carry » 2005
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2005
59.1% pass rate
from 1,493 tests in 2017
(18% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (62% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps (55% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.9% fail on Front lamps (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.067% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.60% fail on Individual lamps (77% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.067% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.60% fail on Horn (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.067% fail on Battery
    • 0.067% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Suspension (32% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Suspension arms (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Spring mounting (71% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.80% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Front (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Rear
    • 0.47% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on Leaf springs
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.20% fail on Shackle
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.067% fail on Shackle bracket
    • 0.20% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.067% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.067% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.067% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
    • 0.067% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.067% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 5.8% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Pipes
        • 0.47% fail on Hoses
        • 0.20% fail on Valves (79% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.067% fail on Leaks
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance (68% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.067% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.067% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs (65% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Condition (67% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.20% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake control components (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal (80% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.067% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.067% fail on Cable
  • 8.8% fail on Tyres
    • 7.2% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.6% fail on Condition (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.8% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.27% fail on Windscreen (75% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.2% fail on Exhaust system (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Emissions (68% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Cap
      • 0.067% fail on Tank
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.87% fail on Chassis
    • 0.27% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.20% fail on Load security
      • 0.13% fail on Loading door
      • 0.067% fail on Access panel
    • 0.067% fail on Body security
    • 0.067% fail on Spare wheel
  • 2.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (56% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Seat belts (42% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (80% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (80% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.067% fail on Free play
        • 0.067% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.067% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.20% fail on Steering control
      • 0.13% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.13% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.067% fail on Steering column
      • 0.067% fail on Steering shaft
  • 0.74% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Towbars
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
    • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment