Suzuki Carry MOT Results

Registered in 2005
55.3% pass rate
from 1,544 tests in 2020
(9.5% better than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Suzuki Carry is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Suspension arms (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 7.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (52% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (73% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.52% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Leaf springs (71% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.065% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.91% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Linkage
    • 0.58% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.32% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.065% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.065% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (37% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.2% fail on Position lamps (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Position lamp (45% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (38% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Switch
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (49% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators (44% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.52% fail on Electrical equipment (79% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.39% fail on Horn (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.065% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.065% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 11% fail on Exhaust emissions (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (19 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.13% fail on Compression ignition (97% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.065% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks (87% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.065% fail on Other leaks
  • 11% fail on Brakes (42% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 4.0% fail on Brake performance (63% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (42% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.78% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.97% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.84% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (62% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.84% fail on Parking brake performance (61% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.065% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.71% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (88% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Rbt (sp) (88% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.39% fail on Brake discs and drums (70% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.39% fail on Brake discs (68% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.45% fail on Lever
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.39% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.19% fail on Load sensing valves (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.065% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.065% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.065% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.065% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.065% fail on Other braking system component
  • 9.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (29% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system (36% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.6% fail on Chassis
      • 1.6% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.58% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Carrier (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.52% fail on Body
      • 0.39% fail on Panel
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.19% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Tank
      • 0.065% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar
      • 0.13% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.13% fail on Doors (82% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
      • 0.065% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.065% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Floor
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.13% fail on Cabs
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.065% fail on Transmission
      • 0.065% fail on Belts
    • 0.065% fail on Load security
      • 0.065% fail on Loading door
  • 9.3% fail on Visibility
    • 5.4% fail on Wipers
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.97% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Driver's view
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (48% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (83% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.65% fail on Steering linkage components (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.065% fail on Other components
        • 0.065% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.26% fail on Steering play
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Steering gear (87% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack (86% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.78% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.78% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.19% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 0.065% fail on Condition
  • 0.065% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.065% fail on Speedometer