Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results
Registered in 198854.6% pass rate
from 97 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1988 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 1988 vans)
- 13% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1988 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Tell tale
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
- 8.2% fail on Front lamps
- 4.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 1.0% fail on All position lamps
- 9.3% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 1988 vans)
- 8.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.2% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.1% fail on All direction indicators
- 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.0% fail on Side repeaters
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.1% fail on Horn
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp
- 2.1% fail on Battery
-
2.1% fail on
Hazard warning
- 2.1% fail on Lamp
- 1.0% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
14% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(190% worse than other 1988 vans)
-
23% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
- 10% fail on Rear wheels
- 7.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 6.2% fail on Front wheels
- 3.1% fail on Brake imbalance
- 3.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
8.2% fail on
Components
- 6.2% fail on Pipes
- 3.1% fail on Valves
- 1.0% fail on Hoses
-
8.2% fail on
Components
-
2.1% fail on
Hub components
- 1.0% fail on Brake pads
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
- 1.0% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.0% fail on
Pedal
-
1.0% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.0% fail on Clevis joint
-
1.0% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
6.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting
- 1.0% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting
-
2.1% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Shackle
- 1.0% fail on Securing bolts
-
1.0% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
2.1% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 2.1% fail on Front
-
1.0% fail on
Panhard rods
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.0% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.0% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
1.0% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
1.0% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
6.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 5.2% fail on Wipers
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Windscreen
- 1.0% fail on Mirrors
-
8.2% fail on
Steering
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
- 4.1% fail on Drag link end (21 times worse than other 1988 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Free play
- 1.0% fail on Steering box
- 1.0% fail on Steering box
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end
- 1.0% fail on Steering arm
-
1.0% fail on
Other components
- 1.0% fail on Steering pivot point
-
1.0% fail on
Steering control
- 1.0% fail on Steering lock
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
- 1.0% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
-
8.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 6.2% fail on Body condition
- 1.0% fail on Engine mountings
-
1.0% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.0% fail on Chassis
-
1.0% fail on
Doors
- 1.0% fail on Drivers
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.1% fail on Emissions
-
3.1% fail on
Fuel system
- 3.1% fail on System
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.0% fail on Attachment
-
6.2% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.0% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.0% fail on Registration plate