Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 1989
59.8% pass rate
from 87 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 5.7% fail on Rbt
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.4% fail on Load sensing valves (4 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.3% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.1% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.1% fail on Brake fluid
    • 1.1% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.6% fail on Body
      • 1.1% fail on Body condition
      • 1.1% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 1.1% fail on Panel
      • 1.1% fail on Other body component
    • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.4% fail on Bumpers (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.3% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
        • 1.1% fail on Bearing housing
    • 1.1% fail on Towbar
      • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 1.1% fail on Floor
    • 1.1% fail on Seats
      • 1.1% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.1% fail on Cabs
      • 1.1% fail on Cab condition
  • 13% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Drag link end (22 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (12 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 1.1% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 2.3% fail on Power steering (7 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Operation
      • 1.1% fail on Other components
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (52% better than other 1989 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Horn
      • 1.1% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 9.2% fail on Suspension
    • 3.4% fail on Axles (12 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (26 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on King pins
    • 3.4% fail on Springs
      • 2.3% fail on Leaf springs
        • 1.1% fail on Shackle bracket
        • 1.1% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Shock absorbers (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
  • 8.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 8.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 6.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.1% fail on Condition
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.3% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates