MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2009

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2009
65.9% pass rate
from 2,402 tests in 2017
(19% better than other 2009 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (35% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps (22% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Rear lamps (58% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (80% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (43% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamps (54% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Matched pair
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Individual lamps (70% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.37% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.62% fail on Horn
    • 0.42% fail on Battery
    • 0.37% fail on Trailer electrical socket (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.042% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Brakes (20% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 9.3% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 4.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.7% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.0% fail on Front wheels (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake operation (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Hydraulic systems (45% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 5.0% fail on Components (53% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes (77% worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.17% fail on Valves
        • 0.042% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.042% fail on Hoses
      • 0.37% fail on Leaks (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Operation
      • 0.042% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Hub components (29% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs (52% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.042% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.042% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 2.5% fail on Parking brake (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on ABS
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.21% fail on Condition
        • 0.042% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.083% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.083% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.042% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 9.3% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Coil springs (64% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Leaf springs (79% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Shackle (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.042% fail on Anchor
        • 0.042% fail on Other pins and bushes
      • 0.042% fail on Spring eye
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Front
      • 0.083% fail on Rear
    • 0.87% fail on Drive shafts (69% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Front drive shafts (74% better than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Constant velocity joints (74% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
        • 0.21% fail on Universal joint (14 times worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Suspension arms (75% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (75% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Front suspension joints (55% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Anti-roll bars (91% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (94% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.042% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.21% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.042% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.042% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.042% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.042% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.042% fail on Condition
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (35% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.42% fail on Windscreen (56% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.042% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.042% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (63% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (52% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Tread depth (34% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.083% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.042% fail on Size/type
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (70% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Steering system (78% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Track rod end (84% better than other 2009 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.042% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.042% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
    • 0.042% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.042% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.92% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (43% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.46% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.29% fail on Condition
      • 0.083% fail on Requirements
      • 0.083% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.62% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (57% better than other 2009 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Body security
    • 0.042% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.042% fail on Chassis
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
  • 0.042% fail on Towbars
    • 0.042% fail on Towbar