Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results
Registered in 200957.3% pass rate
from 2,242 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(29% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (15 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
-
5.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.089% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.045% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.045% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.4% fail on
Rbt
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (75% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.045% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.045% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.36% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.045% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.045% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 0.76% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
6.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 6.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(48% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(37% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Brake linings
-
0.40% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.22% fail on Cable
- 0.089% fail on Linkage
-
1.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(37% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(140% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Lever (140% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(95% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Pedal
-
0.80% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.62% fail on Anti-lock braking system (51% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.49% fail on Load sensing valves (200% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.089% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.089% fail on Other braking system component (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.18% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
0.22% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.18% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.089% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.045% fail on Valves
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(48% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(17% better than other 2009 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
4.2% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (41% better than other 2009 vans)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp
- 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.045% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.67% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.089% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
(34% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.62% fail on Horn
- 0.45% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.045% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.71% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.71% fail on Position lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.089% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.089% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.2% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(39% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.7% fail on Coil spring
-
2.7% fail on
Leaf springs
- 1.6% fail on Leaf spring
- 1.0% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
- 0.045% fail on Anchor bracket
- 0.045% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
- 0.045% fail on Shackle bracket
- 0.94% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Coil springs
-
4.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(29% better than other 2009 vans)
- 2.9% fail on Ball joint
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.045% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(47% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.49% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.089% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (84% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Linkage
- 2.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers (90% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.58% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.045% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.045% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(39% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(22% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
3.2% fail on
Transmission
-
2.2% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Bearing housing
- 0.045% fail on Flexible couplings
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Joints (70% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Flexible couplings
-
2.2% fail on
Prop shafts
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
(2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.045% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.89% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.71% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Pipe
- 0.089% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.76% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.76% fail on
Body
- 0.36% fail on Other body component
- 0.27% fail on Mounting fixings (7 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Panel
- 0.045% fail on Body condition
-
0.54% fail on
Cabs
(3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Steps
- 0.045% fail on Mounting fixings
- 0.18% fail on Floor (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.089% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.089% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.089% fail on
Towbar
- 0.045% fail on Safety device
- 0.045% fail on Other towbar components
-
0.089% fail on
Seats
- 0.045% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.045% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.045% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.045% fail on Boot lid condition
-
7.6% fail on
Visibility
- 5.2% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 2.6% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2009 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.31% fail on Windscreen
-
0.18% fail on
View to rear
(75% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors (74% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Bonnet
-
6.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
- 3.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (61% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (44% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.089% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.089% fail on Catalytic converter (8 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.045% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
0.49% fail on
Spark ignition
(65% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.045% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.045% fail on Catalytic converter
-
5.8% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.31% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.089% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.045% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.62% fail on Condition
- 0.13% fail on Requirements
- 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.9% fail on
Tyres
(55% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth (56% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Condition (56% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.13% fail on Size/type
-
2.4% fail on
Steering
(54% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(70% better than other 2009 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Ball joint
- 0.089% fail on Drag link end
- 0.045% fail on Locking devices
-
0.67% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.54% fail on Steering rack
- 0.089% fail on Operation
- 0.045% fail on Steering box
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
- 0.45% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.089% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.089% fail on
Steering play
- 0.089% fail on Steering rack
-
1.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(70% better than other 2009 vans)
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(86% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates (87% worse than other 2009 vans)
-
0.67% fail on
Road Wheels
(110% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Attachment (130% worse than other 2009 vans)
- 0.089% fail on Condition
-
0.045% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.045% fail on Belt(s)/padding