Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2010
67.0% pass rate
from 3,244 tests in 2017
(16% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Position lamps (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Front lamps (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Rear lamps (36% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Headlamp (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Direction indicators (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Flashing type (65% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.80% fail on Individual lamps (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.031% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.59% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Battery
    • 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.031% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.031% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.031% fail on Lamp
  • 14% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.5% fail on Rear wheels (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.062% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.031% fail on Gradient hand brake
    • 4.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.3% fail on Components (71% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.062% fail on Valves
        • 0.031% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.031% fail on Hoses
      • 0.31% fail on Leaks (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
    • 2.7% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Hub components (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Brake discs (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.062% fail on Brake drums (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Brake back plates
      • 0.031% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.43% fail on ABS
    • 0.34% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.34% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip (68% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.15% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.12% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.031% fail on Linkage
      • 0.031% fail on Cable
      • 0.031% fail on Clevis joint
      • 0.031% fail on Pivot
    • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
  • 9.0% fail on Suspension (34% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Leaf springs (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins and bushes
        • 0.25% fail on Shackle
        • 0.031% fail on Anchor
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.77% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Front drive shafts (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.65% fail on Constant velocity joints (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Couplings
      • 0.092% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.062% fail on Universal joint (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.031% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.65% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.59% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension arms (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
    • 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Front (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.031% fail on Rear
    • 0.062% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.031% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.031% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (33% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen (67% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors (84% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres (43% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.96% fail on Condition (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
    • 0.031% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.092% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 1.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.96% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.86% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.062% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.031% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.55% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Steering system (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.18% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Free play
        • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.092% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.062% fail on Other components
        • 0.062% fail on Steering pivot point
      • 0.031% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.43% fail on Power steering
      • 0.22% fail on Operation
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.092% fail on Other components
      • 0.031% fail on Rams
    • 0.092% fail on Steering control
      • 0.062% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.062% fail on Universal joint
      • 0.031% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.062% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.031% fail on Locking devices
  • 0.59% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.062% fail on Load security
      • 0.031% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.031% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.031% fail on Doors
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers
    • 0.031% fail on Seats
      • 0.031% fail on Drivers
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Condition
  • 0.18% fail on Towbars (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.031% fail on Swivelling towbar