MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2010

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.7% pass rate
from 3,159 tests in 2020
(12% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (4.8% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.92% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (23 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.095% fail on Service brake performance (9 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (99% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (15% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.032% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (18 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (36% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (41% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Brake linings (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (29% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (30% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Cable (57% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Pivot (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Lever
        • 0.032% fail on Linkage
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (1.5% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6.6% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Electronic stability control (29% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (59% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems (43% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Brake fluid (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (11% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Flexible brake hoses (73% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.032% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.032% fail on Additional braking device
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (87% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (90% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Stop lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Trailer electrical socket (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Battery(ies) (52% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device (13% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (56% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (56% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.66% fail on Reversing lamps (4.8% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Reversing lamps (8.6% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Position lamps (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Position lamp (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Rear reflectors (3.6% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.032% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Springs (72% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Coil springs (95% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Coil spring (93% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.095% fail on Mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Leaf springs (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.98% fail on Leaf spring (12% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.032% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.032% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.22% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint dust cover (9.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint (90% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2.3% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.70% fail on Wheel bearings (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (31% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Other suspension component (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint dust cover (25% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Other suspension component (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut (39% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Suspension rods (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.063% fail on Sub-frames (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.032% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 7.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (7.0% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Transmission (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Prop shaft (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Flexible couplings (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Bearing housing (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.85% fail on Drive shafts (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Joints (76% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.57% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Chassis (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Chassis condition (56% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Body (21% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Panel (3.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.063% fail on Mounting fixings (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Body condition
    • 0.19% fail on Cabs (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Towbar (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.095% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Tank (17% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.095% fail on Seats (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Driver's seat (29% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.032% fail on Load security
      • 0.032% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.032% fail on Other tailgate component
    • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (14% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet (1.2% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen (72% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Window
    • 0.095% fail on View to rear (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Mirrors (87% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type (67% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (54% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (54% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.95% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (49% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Emission control equipment (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.032% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.28% fail on Spark ignition (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested (92% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.032% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks (50% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Seat belts (7.7% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (4.5% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Prescribed areas (16% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Requirements (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Airbags (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 1.3% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.63% fail on Steering linkage components (85% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Track rod end (88% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Ball joint (51% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.095% fail on Drag link end (89% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on Power steering (21% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipes and hoses (2.9% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (6.3% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Steering rack (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Steering play (9.8% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack (12% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.95% fail on Identification of the vehicle (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Registration plates (40% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.54% fail on Road Wheels (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.032% fail on Condition
  • 0.032% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.032% fail on Belt(s)/padding