MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Toyota » Hi-Lux » 2010

Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2010
60.1% pass rate
from 3,141 tests in 2021
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes (18% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (41% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (19 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake performance (69% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.13% fail on Decelerometer (15 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (16 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.032% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.096% fail on Decelerometer (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.064% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.032% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (48% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (49% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs and drums (58% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Brake discs (61% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.19% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.16% fail on Cable
        • 0.032% fail on Linkage
    • 1.6% fail on Parking brake control (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.70% fail on Electronic stability control (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (86% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Pedal
    • 0.32% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.032% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.096% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.096% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.096% fail on Other braking system component (11 times worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp (36% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (49% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (31% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (45% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.13% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.032% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (59% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Individual direction indicators (55% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.70% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 0.064% fail on Rear reflectors (80% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.064% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.064% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.032% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.032% fail on Switch
  • 13% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Springs (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Coil springs (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Coil spring (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.096% fail on Mounting
      • 1.6% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.76% fail on Leaf spring (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.096% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.096% fail on Spring saddle (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 3.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.41% fail on Linkage ball joints (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage
      • 0.032% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Suspension arms (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.67% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.064% fail on Axles
      • 0.064% fail on Axle
    • 0.064% fail on Macpherson strut (80% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.064% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust system (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 2.4% fail on Prop shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.92% fail on Drive shafts (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.89% fail on Joints (74% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.032% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure (83% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (82% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.83% fail on Chassis (78% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Chassis condition (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.57% fail on Bumpers (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.48% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Tank (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.096% fail on Hose
      • 0.032% fail on Pipe
    • 0.35% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Mounting fixings (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Panel
      • 0.096% fail on Other body component
    • 0.16% fail on Towbar (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.096% fail on Other towbar components (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Coupling
      • 0.032% fail on Safety device
    • 0.096% fail on Cabs
      • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.064% fail on Doors (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition
      • 0.032% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition
    • 0.064% fail on Undertray
    • 0.032% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.032% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.032% fail on Load security
      • 0.032% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.032% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.032% fail on Floor
    • 0.032% fail on Seats
      • 0.032% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.032% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.032% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 7.0% fail on Visibility (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Wipers
    • 2.5% fail on Washers (39% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.29% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.16% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear (78% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors (82% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (46% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (47% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.86% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.064% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.032% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.22% fail on Spark ignition (80% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.064% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Other leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.032% fail on Airbags
      • 0.032% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.8% fail on Tyres (55% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Condition (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.096% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Steering (68% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.35% fail on Power steering
      • 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
      • 0.032% fail on Rams
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.096% fail on Steering play
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Steering column
  • 0.96% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.96% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment (110% worse than other 2010 vans)