Toyota Hi-Lux MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.5% pass rate
from 3,399 tests in 2020
(11% better than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Toyota Hi-Lux is unusually good or bad.

  • 17% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Brake performance (51% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 1.0% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (22 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.059% fail on Gradient tester (sp) (27 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Service brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 3.1% fail on Service brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.088% fail on Decelerometer (12 times worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.088% fail on Service brake performance (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.68% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.12% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (88% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (49% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads (39% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.41% fail on Brake discs and drums (73% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.029% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.15% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.088% fail on Cable
        • 0.059% fail on Clevis joint (21 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (98% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Hand lever (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pedal
    • 0.91% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.74% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.35% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.21% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.059% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.059% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.059% fail on Valves (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.088% fail on Other components (6 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (21% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp (45% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.088% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Electrical equipment (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn (170% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Trailer electrical socket (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.68% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.059% fail on Side repeaters (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.71% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.71% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.088% fail on Rear reflectors (74% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.029% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.0% fail on Springs (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.4% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 6.4% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.94% fail on Leaf spring
        • 0.65% fail on Shackle pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Anchor pins and bushes
        • 0.059% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.029% fail on Anchor bracket
        • 0.029% fail on Shackle bracket
      • 0.088% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms (68% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.059% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (43% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joints (89% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.059% fail on Linkage (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.94% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.38% fail on Wheel bearings (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.029% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.029% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 6.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (35% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Prop shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.85% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Prop shaft (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Flexible couplings (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Bearing housing
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (66% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.1% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Bumpers (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.24% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (61% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Tank
      • 0.059% fail on Pipe
      • 0.029% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.029% fail on System
    • 0.21% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Safety device (13 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.029% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.21% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.059% fail on Body condition
      • 0.029% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.15% fail on Chassis
      • 0.15% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.088% fail on Undertray
    • 0.059% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.029% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.029% fail on Carrier
    • 0.059% fail on Seats
      • 0.059% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.029% fail on Floor
    • 0.029% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.029% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.029% fail on Cabs
      • 0.029% fail on Steps
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility (28% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers (37% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass (65% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.029% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.6% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth (25% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Condition (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.088% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (59% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (51% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (46% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.53% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.35% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (82% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.029% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.029% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.029% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.18% fail on Spark ignition (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.059% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.15% fail on Fluid leaks (74% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.029% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (53% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.26% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.029% fail on Requirements
    • 0.088% fail on Airbags
      • 0.088% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.029% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 1.4% fail on Steering (72% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Steering linkage components (83% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.38% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.029% fail on Other components
        • 0.029% fail on Steering component
      • 0.029% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.29% fail on Power steering
      • 0.15% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Other components
      • 0.088% fail on Operation
    • 0.26% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.26% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.088% fail on Steering play
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.029% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.029% fail on Universal joint
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle (63% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates (64% worse than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.29% fail on Attachment
  • 0.029% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.029% fail on Speedometer