Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
46.9% pass rate
from 1,506 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (61% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps (37% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 8.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 7.1% fail on Direction indicators (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Flashing type (94% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (89% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.93% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.13% fail on Switch
        • 0.066% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp (49% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Fog lamp (76% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.066% fail on Switch
    • 0.60% fail on Horn (79% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.066% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 7.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Attachment
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
    • 7.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
      • 0.066% fail on Linkage condition
    • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (79% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Front drive shafts (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 6.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.066% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.066% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.066% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Location (4 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Prescribed areas (73% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Component mounting (71% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Subframe mounting (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Spring mounting (90% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.53% fail on Rear
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.00% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.00% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.60% fail on Shock absorbers (70% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.60% fail on Condition (70% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Radius arms (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Axles
      • 0.13% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.066% fail on Axle beam
      • 0.066% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.20% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.20% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
      • 0.066% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.066% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Torsion bars (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.066% fail on General condition
    • 0.066% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.066% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Brakes (14% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 15% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 14% fail on Components (49% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 8.6% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.8% fail on Pipes
        • 3.3% fail on Hoses (65% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.20% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.20% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.73% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.066% fail on Operation
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.7% fail on Front wheels (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (45% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.066% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hub components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.066% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.066% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.73% fail on Pedal
        • 0.60% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.20% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.066% fail on Cable
    • 0.066% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.066% fail on Components
        • 0.066% fail on Pipes
    • 0.066% fail on ABS
    • 0.066% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.066% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 7.0% fail on Wipers
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.80% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
  • 10% fail on Tyres (41% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (58% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.66% fail on Size/type
    • 0.066% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.9% fail on Steering
    • 8.1% fail on Steering system (26% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.3% fail on Track rod end (62% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.066% fail on Free play
        • 0.066% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.53% fail on Steering operation (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Power steering
      • 0.20% fail on Operation
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
      • 0.066% fail on Rams
    • 0.066% fail on Steering control
      • 0.066% fail on Steering lock
  • 8.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system (54% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.066% fail on Pipe
      • 0.066% fail on Cap
    • 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 5.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Seat belts (50% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (36% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2000 vans)
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (67% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.86% fail on Body condition (81% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.66% fail on Vehicle structure (74% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.66% fail on Chassis (74% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.53% fail on Seats
      • 0.46% fail on Drivers
      • 0.066% fail on Passengers
    • 0.46% fail on Doors
      • 0.20% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.20% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.13% fail on Body security
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.20% fail on Condition