MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2000

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2000
48.9% pass rate
from 806 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2000 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Direction indicators (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 6.9% fail on Flashing type (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on Switch
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.12% fail on Dipswitch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim (51% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Electrical equipment (52% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.99% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.50% fail on Horn (76% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.50% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.12% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.12% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 7.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake performance
      • 5.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.7% fail on Rbt
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.99% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.37% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (81% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (81% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (84% better than other 2000 vans)
          • 0.25% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 5.2% fail on Load sensing valves (140% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.37% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.37% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.62% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.50% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.50% fail on Pedal
      • 0.12% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.37% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.37% fail on Lever
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.12% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.12% fail on Valves
    • 0.12% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Additional braking device
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (80% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (7 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (11 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage
    • 4.5% fail on Springs (68% worse than other 2000 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Torsion bars
        • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket
      • 0.12% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (70% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.37% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.12% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.25% fail on Axles
      • 0.12% fail on Axle
      • 0.12% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.12% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 13% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission
      • 5.3% fail on Drive shafts (72% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 5.3% fail on Joints (76% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (69% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (69% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Body
      • 0.62% fail on Other body component
      • 0.12% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.12% fail on Panel
    • 0.74% fail on Chassis (76% better than other 2000 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Chassis condition (76% better than other 2000 vans)
    • 0.62% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.12% fail on Tank
      • 0.12% fail on Hose
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe
    • 0.50% fail on Seats
      • 0.37% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.25% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.12% fail on Carrier
    • 0.25% fail on Towbar
      • 0.12% fail on Towbar condition
      • 0.12% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.25% fail on Doors
      • 0.25% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.12% fail on Cabs
      • 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.87% fail on View to rear
      • 0.87% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.50% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.50% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.5% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.0% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.74% fail on Power steering
      • 0.50% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
      • 0.12% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres (46% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.62% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.1% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.12% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.74% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.74% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (81% better than other 2000 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.12% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (6 times worse than other 2000 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.6% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.74% fail on Condition
      • 0.12% fail on Requirements
    • 0.12% fail on Airbags
      • 0.12% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.1% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.12% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.12% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment