Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2003
46.6% pass rate
from 8,685 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 32% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.5% fail on Stop lamp (27% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Rear lamps (28% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Switch
      • 0.012% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamp aim (11% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Direction indicators (59% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.7% fail on Flashing type (59% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.3% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.79% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.012% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 4.5% fail on Horn (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp (42% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Switch
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.023% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.012% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.012% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.012% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp (68% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.092% fail on Switch
      • 0.081% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.058% fail on Trailer electrical socket (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors (90% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.012% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.012% fail on Lamp
  • 25% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (29% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (54% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage condition (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment (77% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
    • 7.6% fail on Suspension arms (60% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (58% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Condition
    • 5.8% fail on Coil springs (98% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Location
    • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts (29% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Front drive shafts (28% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (28% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Couplings
        • 0.012% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.046% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.046% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.6% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.1% fail on Front
      • 0.53% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (82% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Component mounting (80% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Subframe mounting (58% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.37% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (80% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Radius arms (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Axles
      • 0.14% fail on Axle beam (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Swivel joints/housing (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Stub axle
      • 0.012% fail on King pins
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.092% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.092% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.069% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.058% fail on Condition
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.046% fail on General condition
    • 0.046% fail on Torsion bars (4 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.012% fail on Condition
    • 0.012% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.012% fail on Pipes
  • 18% fail on Brakes (15% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 13% fail on Hydraulic systems (28% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 13% fail on Components (30% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 8.0% fail on Valves (180% worse than other 2003 vans)
        • 5.0% fail on Pipes (21% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.069% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.046% fail on Reservoirs (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.10% fail on Operation
    • 6.9% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Front wheels (18% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Rear wheels (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Brake imbalance (37% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Brake performance not tested (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components (19% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.023% fail on Brake calipers (81% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Service brake control components (39% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Pedal (39% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip (45% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake (75% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition (75% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.14% fail on ABS (68% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Additional braking devices (5 times worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.046% fail on Mechanical components (91% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Brake slack adjuster
      • 0.012% fail on Lever
      • 0.012% fail on Cable
      • 0.012% fail on Pivot
    • 0.035% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.023% fail on Components
        • 0.023% fail on Valves
      • 0.012% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
    • 0.023% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.012% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.012% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (13% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers (17% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.48% fail on Mirrors (59% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Bonnet (85% better than other 2003 vans)
  • 10% fail on Tyres (18% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.8% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (52% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 6.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 6.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Drivers airbag (200% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Passengers airbag (6 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.012% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (40% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (57% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Condition
      • 0.22% fail on Requirements
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment
      • 0.023% fail on Installation check
        • 0.023% fail on Anchorage's
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.7% fail on Exhaust system (36% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Emissions
    • 0.62% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.38% fail on Fuel system (70% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on System (67% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Cap (65% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.058% fail on Pipe
      • 0.035% fail on Hose
      • 0.012% fail on Tank
  • 6.9% fail on Steering
    • 5.2% fail on Steering system (17% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Track rod end (14% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Free play (66% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.10% fail on Steering rack (63% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.081% fail on Steering arm (59% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.035% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.023% fail on Other components (81% better than other 2003 vans)
        • 0.012% fail on Steering pivot point
        • 0.012% fail on Steering component
      • 0.012% fail on Steering damper
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering (62% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Other components (140% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation
      • 0.39% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.12% fail on Rams (2 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Pump
    • 0.36% fail on Steering operation (110% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering control
      • 0.058% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.046% fail on Steering column
      • 0.046% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.035% fail on Universal joint
        • 0.012% fail on Flexible coupling
      • 0.012% fail on Steering lock
    • 0.012% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (43% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Doors (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Passengers other (3 times worse than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers front (85% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition (69% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Spare wheel (95% worse than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers
      • 0.035% fail on Drivers (84% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Vehicle structure (90% better than other 2003 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Chassis (90% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Engine mountings (82% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.035% fail on Body security (78% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.023% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.012% fail on Load security
      • 0.012% fail on Loading door
  • 1.5% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment (51% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Towbars (66% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.058% fail on Vehicle structure (74% better than other 2003 vans)
    • 0.046% fail on Towbar