Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.9% pass rate
from 9,103 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (5.2% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.2% fail on Stop lamp (42% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (49% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.033% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (15% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Electrical equipment (50% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Horn (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.74% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.11% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.033% fail on Trailer electrical socket (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.099% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps (28% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp (25% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device (61% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.80% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (74% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.099% fail on Switch
    • 0.022% fail on Rear reflectors (95% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.011% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.011% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.011% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.011% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 9.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (80% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage (69% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.022% fail on Pins and bushes (98% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.011% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms (17% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.4% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (84% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.3% fail on Springs (14% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.1% fail on Coil springs (33% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.1% fail on Coil spring (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Torsion bars (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.077% fail on Torsion bar (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket
      • 0.044% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (92% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.79% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.47% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Axles (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Axle (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Stub axle
    • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.12% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.19% fail on Sub-frames (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (80% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.033% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Brakes (28% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.011% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (44% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.69% fail on Service brake imbalance (39% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.033% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.011% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.86% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (sp) (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Rbt (83% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.011% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.033% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.011% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (21% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.044% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (42% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (42% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.066% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (89% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.044% fail on Cable (90% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Lever
        • 0.011% fail on Linkage
    • 1.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (20% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.56% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.46% fail on Pedal
      • 0.099% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems (61% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.15% fail on Valves (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.044% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.011% fail on Servos
    • 0.34% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.033% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Lever (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.055% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (70% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Additional braking device (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
    • 0.011% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.011% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure (20% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (27% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Transmission (18% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.033% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.033% fail on Bearing housing
        • 0.011% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts (87% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Joints (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Belts
    • 1.3% fail on Doors (78% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Catch
      • 0.055% fail on Front passenger's door (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition (81% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Catch
      • 0.044% fail on Driver's door (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition (73% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Body (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Other body component (43% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Panel (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Body condition
    • 0.32% fail on Spare wheel (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Carrier (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.32% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Passenger's seat (76% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Driver's seat (77% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Chassis (86% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Chassis condition (86% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.22% fail on Fuel system (74% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.088% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (64% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on System
      • 0.044% fail on Pipe (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Tank (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.088% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.033% fail on Bracket
    • 0.099% fail on Towbar
      • 0.088% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.011% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.055% fail on Undertray
    • 0.044% fail on Bumpers (90% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.011% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.011% fail on Floor
    • 0.011% fail on Cabs
      • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility (9.5% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 4.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.45% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.43% fail on View to rear (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Mirrors (49% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.099% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.022% fail on Bonnet (89% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth (18% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition (26% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.34% fail on Size/type
  • 7.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (57% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (41% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Prescribed areas (46% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment
      • 0.044% fail on Requirements
    • 0.15% fail on Airbags (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.033% fail on Passengers airbag (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components (24% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Track rod end (23% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.044% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
        • 0.011% fail on Steering component
        • 0.011% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.011% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.9% fail on Steering gear (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Steering rack (99% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.044% fail on Operation
      • 0.011% fail on Steering box
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (85% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Other components (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Operation (82% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Pipes and hoses (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.055% fail on Rams
      • 0.011% fail on Pump
    • 0.23% fail on Steering play
      • 0.23% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.13% fail on Steering wheel (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.099% fail on Steering column (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.044% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.044% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (14% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Compression ignition (32% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (62% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (67% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.44% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.033% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.022% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 1.4% fail on Spark ignition (83% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.00% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.34% fail on Catalyst emissions (93% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.011% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.011% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (34% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.077% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.066% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.022% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.011% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.011% fail on Undertray
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle (49% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates (49% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.32% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.20% fail on Attachment
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
  • 0.022% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.011% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.011% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.011% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.011% fail on Speedometer