MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2005

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2005
50.8% pass rate
from 6,600 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (10.0% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Stop lamp (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 6.1% fail on Direction indicators (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 6.1% fail on Flashing type (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (41% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Side repeaters (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.47% fail on All direction indicators (100% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Switch
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (18% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Electrical equipment (64% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Horn (66% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.091% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps (39% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp (37% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Headlamp levelling device (77% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.71% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (76% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.71% fail on Rear fog lamp (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.39% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.015% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
    • 0.061% fail on Hazard warning (89% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Switch (89% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.030% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (37% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (74% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint (71% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage (54% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.061% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (92% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 7.9% fail on Suspension arms (18% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (75% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover (32% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.8% fail on Springs
      • 3.8% fail on Coil springs (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.8% fail on Coil spring (56% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Mounting
      • 0.061% fail on Torsion bars (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Torsion bar (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket
      • 0.030% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (95% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (53% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.50% fail on Other suspension component (36% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.091% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.030% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.41% fail on Axles (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Axle (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (76% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.26% fail on Sub-frames (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.061% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.045% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.076% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.015% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension unit
  • 13% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.7% fail on Brake performance (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance (40% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (39% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (46% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.82% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.030% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (85% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp) (85% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.26% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (85% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested (50% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (26% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.045% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads (38% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Brake linings
    • 2.2% fail on Load sensing valves (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.62% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.58% fail on Pedal
      • 0.061% fail on Hand lever (69% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.14% fail on Reservoirs (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Valves
      • 0.030% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.015% fail on Servos
    • 0.26% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.015% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Lever (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.045% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.030% fail on Servos
      • 0.015% fail on Valves
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure (13% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Transmission
      • 3.8% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Joints
        • 0.030% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.18% fail on Prop shafts (78% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.18% fail on Joints
    • 1.5% fail on Doors (98% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Other passenger's door (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Door condition (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Catch
      • 0.12% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.12% fail on Door condition
      • 0.061% fail on Driver's door (70% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.061% fail on Door condition
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure (59% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (58% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.55% fail on Body
      • 0.35% fail on Other body component
      • 0.20% fail on Panel
      • 0.015% fail on Mounting fixings
    • 0.35% fail on Chassis (84% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Chassis condition (84% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.35% fail on Seats
      • 0.21% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system (56% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.091% fail on Tank (62% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe
      • 0.015% fail on System
    • 0.30% fail on Spare wheel (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.23% fail on Carrier (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.11% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.091% fail on Bumpers (74% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.061% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.045% fail on Boot lid condition
      • 0.015% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.030% fail on Cabs (90% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas (88% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.015% fail on Towbar
      • 0.015% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.015% fail on Load security
      • 0.015% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.015% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.6% fail on Wipers
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.47% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.44% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.030% fail on Window
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear (78% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors (78% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Bonnet (84% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 8.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Prescribed areas (22% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Condition
      • 0.076% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
      • 0.015% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.27% fail on Airbags (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Passengers airbag (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components (21% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (16% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.076% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
    • 2.2% fail on Steering gear (86% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Steering rack (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Operation (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.97% fail on Power steering (48% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.42% fail on Operation (84% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Other components
      • 0.23% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.030% fail on Pump
      • 0.030% fail on Rams
    • 0.20% fail on Steering wheel (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.015% fail on Steering column
    • 0.015% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.015% fail on Universal joint
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.1% fail on Compression ignition (32% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.62% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (65% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.39% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.86% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.061% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.045% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.030% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.015% fail on Undertray
  • 0.38% fail on Identification of the vehicle (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates (53% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels (54% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Attachment (55% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Condition
  • 0.015% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.015% fail on Doors
      • 0.015% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors