Citroen Berlingo MOT Results
Registered in 200652.5% pass rate
from 8,396 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (39% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Direction indicators
(31% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
(31% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (44% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.24% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.1% fail on
Flashing type
(31% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 3.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (24% better than other 2006 vans)
-
2.8% fail on
Electrical equipment
(72% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Horn (87% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.96% fail on Battery(ies) (120% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Electrical wiring
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2006 vans)
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp (34% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Headlamp levelling device (76% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(79% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(79% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp (79% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.62% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(79% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.39% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.39% fail on Position lamp
- 0.036% fail on Rear reflectors (92% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.024% fail on
Hazard warning
(95% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Switch (95% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.012% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.012% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.012% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.012% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
19% fail on
Suspension
(6.9% better than other 2006 vans)
-
7.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(17% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (99% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.94% fail on Ball joint (68% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.095% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (85% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.083% fail on Linkage (78% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint dust cover (30% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.8% fail on
Springs
(22% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 4.7% fail on Coil spring (110% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Mounting
-
0.060% fail on
Torsion bars
(10 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Torsion bar (11 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment bracket
- 0.012% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
4.7% fail on
Coil springs
(110% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 2.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (73% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.43% fail on
Axles
(2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.25% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Axle (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.036% fail on Swivel joints/housing (8 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Stub axle
-
0.27% fail on
Other suspension component
(62% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Ball joint dust cover (63% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.18% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.048% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.012% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.15% fail on
Sub-frames
(71% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.048% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Sub-frame (82% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.071% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint
- 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
-
7.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(17% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(29% better than other 2006 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 2006 vans)
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
(38% better than other 2006 vans)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(39% better than other 2006 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.57% fail on Service brake imbalance (41% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.083% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.012% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.012% fail on Service brake performance (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
(39% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.68% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(89% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.31% fail on
Parking brake performance
(88% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
(88% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance (91% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (70% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.024% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.024% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
(88% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (17% better than other 2006 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2006 vans)
-
2.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(37% better than other 2006 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
- 0.012% fail on Brake drums
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(45% better than other 2006 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Brake linings
-
0.024% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(96% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Cable
- 0.012% fail on Lever
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.1% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(47% better than other 2006 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (44% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.66% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.62% fail on Pedal
- 0.071% fail on Hand lever (64% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.071% fail on Valves
- 0.024% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.29% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.29% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (130% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake control
(62% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.23% fail on Lever (64% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.21% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.036% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.024% fail on Servos
- 0.012% fail on Leaks
-
0.024% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(86% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Additional braking device
-
4.6% fail on
Brake performance
(56% better than other 2006 vans)
-
10% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(18% better than other 2006 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Exhaust system (54% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Transmission
(14% better than other 2006 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.0% fail on Joints
- 0.036% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.012% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.012% fail on Bearing housing
-
0.071% fail on
Prop shafts
(92% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.071% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2006 vans)
-
4.1% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.79% fail on
Doors
-
0.60% fail on
Other passenger's door
(140% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.58% fail on Door condition (150% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Catch
-
0.12% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.083% fail on
Front passenger's door
(69% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.083% fail on Door condition (69% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Other passenger's door
(140% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
0.60% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(75% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (74% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.40% fail on
Seats
- 0.29% fail on Passenger's seat (80% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.15% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.38% fail on
Body
(48% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.21% fail on Other body component (46% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Panel
-
0.32% fail on
Chassis
(82% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Chassis condition (82% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.26% fail on
Spare wheel
(130% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Carrier (160% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.083% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.15% fail on
Fuel system
(77% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.095% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (62% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.024% fail on Pipe (83% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Tank
- 0.012% fail on Hose
- 0.012% fail on System
-
0.060% fail on
Engine mounting
(73% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.048% fail on Engine mounting condition (74% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Bracket
- 0.048% fail on Bumpers (87% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.036% fail on
Cabs
(88% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas (86% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.024% fail on
Load security
- 0.024% fail on Loading door
-
0.012% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.012% fail on Other boot lid component
- 0.012% fail on Passenger compartment
- 0.012% fail on Undertray
-
8.5% fail on
Visibility
(15% better than other 2006 vans)
- 5.3% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers (36% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.50% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.50% fail on Windscreen
-
0.44% fail on
View to rear
(40% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Mirrors (40% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.060% fail on Bonnet (70% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Driver's view
-
8.0% fail on
Tyres
(25% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 4.4% fail on Tread depth (18% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (34% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.33% fail on Size/type
-
5.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(41% better than other 2006 vans)
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.036% fail on
Other components
- 0.024% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.012% fail on Steering component
- 0.024% fail on Steering arm
- 0.012% fail on Drag link end
-
1.9% fail on
Steering gear
(86% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Steering rack (84% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.083% fail on Operation (190% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Steering box
-
1.2% fail on
Power steering
(110% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.45% fail on Operation (140% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.43% fail on Other components (100% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses (90% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.095% fail on Rams (2 times worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Pump
-
0.21% fail on
Steering play
- 0.21% fail on Steering rack
- 0.071% fail on Steering column
- 0.036% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.024% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.024% fail on Universal joint
- 0.012% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
(41% better than other 2006 vans)
-
4.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (88% worse than other 2006 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts
(44% better than other 2006 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (39% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.38% fail on Condition (52% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.012% fail on Attachment
- 0.012% fail on Requirements
- 0.012% fail on Pre-tensioners
-
0.071% fail on
Airbags
- 0.071% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(16% better than other 2006 vans)
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% better than other 2006 vans)
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(28% better than other 2006 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (44% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.73% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.45% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (36% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (80% worse than other 2006 vans)
- 0.060% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.060% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.88% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.21% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.012% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
2.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(28% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.75% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.67% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.048% fail on Other leaks
- 0.024% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.012% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.024% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.024% fail on Undertray
-
3.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.35% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(60% better than other 2006 vans)
- 0.35% fail on Registration plates (59% better than other 2006 vans)
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.29% fail on Attachment
- 0.036% fail on Condition