MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2008
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2008
54.9% pass rate
from 8,905 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (5.3% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 9.4% fail on Stop lamp (30% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Position lamps (28% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Front lamps (33% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Rear lamps (20% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.4% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (16% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (38% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters (59% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.13% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Tell tales
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.034% fail on Switch
      • 0.011% fail on Dipswitch
    • 0.73% fail on Rear fog lamp (70% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.69% fail on Fog lamp (72% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Switch
      • 0.011% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.70% fail on Battery (62% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.079% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.022% fail on Rear reflectors (95% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Hazard warning (94% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Lamp
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Suspension (17% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Drive shafts (95% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 5.1% fail on Front drive shafts (98% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 5.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (99% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Couplings
        • 0.011% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.022% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.022% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (43% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (29% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.47% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (70% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition (77% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Condition
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment (92% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Coil springs (21% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (22% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Location
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms (26% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (25% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Attachment
      • 0.022% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
      • 0.36% fail on Rear
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (33% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Trailing arms (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Macpherson strut (47% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Axles (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Axle beam (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.056% fail on Swivel joints/housing (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Stub axle (21 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Clearance
    • 0.15% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.034% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.022% fail on Torsion bars (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas (97% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Component mounting (94% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.1% fail on Tyres (29% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth (29% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Size/type
    • 0.12% fail on Valve stem
  • 9.0% fail on Brakes (44% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Rear wheels (64% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.52% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.034% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.034% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (40% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (42% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Pipes (84% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Hoses (41% better than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.034% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.25% fail on Leaks
      • 0.15% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.079% fail on Operation
    • 2.5% fail on Hub components (43% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (47% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.93% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.067% fail on Brake calipers (71% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.011% fail on Wheel cylinder
    • 0.66% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.66% fail on Pedal
        • 0.64% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.022% fail on Condition
    • 0.44% fail on ABS (45% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Parking brake (85% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Mechanical components (57% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Cable (55% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage
    • 0.16% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.034% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.034% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.022% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.011% fail on Valves
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (11% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers (16% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.54% fail on Mirrors (44% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.067% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.2% fail on Steering
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system
      • 2.3% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (53% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.067% fail on Free play
        • 0.067% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.034% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.022% fail on Steering damper (7 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.011% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.85% fail on Power steering (45% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Other components (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.045% fail on Rams
    • 0.31% fail on Steering control (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering wheel (4 times worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering coupling (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Universal joint (160% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Steering column
      • 0.022% fail on Steering shaft
    • 0.22% fail on Steering operation (110% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.011% fail on Locking devices
  • 4.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (27% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions (170% worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system (30% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.31% fail on System
      • 0.21% fail on Cap
      • 0.034% fail on Tank
      • 0.034% fail on Pipe
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
    • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (30% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (28% worse than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.67% fail on Seat belts (49% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Condition
      • 0.056% fail on Attachment
      • 0.045% fail on Prescribed areas (92% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.034% fail on Requirements
  • 1.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.30% fail on Spare wheel (3 times worse than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.28% fail on Doors (51% better than other 2008 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.045% fail on Drivers
      • 0.045% fail on Passengers front (79% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Body condition (72% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers
      • 0.067% fail on Passengers
    • 0.079% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.034% fail on Load security
      • 0.022% fail on Loading door
      • 0.011% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.011% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.011% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.011% fail on Body security
  • 0.44% fail on Registration plates and VIN (55% better than other 2008 vans)
    • 0.44% fail on Registration plate (55% better than other 2008 vans)
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Attachment
    • 0.067% fail on Condition
  • 0.011% fail on Towbars
    • 0.011% fail on Towbar