MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2016

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
67.8% pass rate
from 15,244 tests in 2021
(20% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (76% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.013% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.0066% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (36% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.85% fail on Individual direction indicators (77% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.35% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (52% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.35% fail on Rear fog lamp (53% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0066% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0066% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.26% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.21% fail on Horn (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.013% fail on Trailer electrical socket (84% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.20% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.20% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.052% fail on Reversing lamps (71% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Reversing lamps (78% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.026% fail on Rear reflectors (88% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 0.0066% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (83% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers (32% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.52% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.20% fail on View to rear (48% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.20% fail on Mirrors (48% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0066% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.026% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0066% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (27% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.085% fail on Size/type
  • 5.9% fail on Brakes (9.3% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (13% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake pads (13% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs and drums (32% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.56% fail on Brake discs (31% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.059% fail on Cable
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt
          • 0.80% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.085% fail on Service brake imbalance (62% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.098% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (63% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.092% fail on Rbt (sp) (64% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.052% fail on Service brake performance (66% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake imbalance (64% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0066% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.072% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (96% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.072% fail on Rbt (sp) (96% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Rbt (89% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.0066% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0066% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.046% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.93% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (65% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Anti-lock braking system (81% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.45% fail on Electronic stability control (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.83% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Pedal (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses (78% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.046% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.026% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.020% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.026% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.026% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.013% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.013% fail on Servos
    • 0.0066% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0066% fail on Lever
  • 3.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (48% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Transmission (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Joints (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0066% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.092% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.092% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Tank (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.059% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.039% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.12% fail on Spare wheel (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Carrier (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.098% fail on Body (69% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.098% fail on Other body component (62% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.085% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.072% fail on Undertray
    • 0.039% fail on Doors (70% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0066% fail on Catch
      • 0.013% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.013% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0066% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0066% fail on Door condition
    • 0.013% fail on Seats (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.5% fail on Suspension (45% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.95% fail on Suspension arms (25% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (30% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Ball joint dust cover (54% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Springs (43% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Coil springs (36% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Coil spring (36% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0066% fail on Mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Anti-roll bars (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.052% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (94% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.0066% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.098% fail on Wheel bearings (61% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.020% fail on Shock absorbers (96% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.0066% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 2.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.066% fail on Requirements (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.026% fail on Attachment
      • 0.020% fail on Pre-tensioners (4 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0066% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.072% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0066% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0066% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust emissions (46% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.80% fail on Compression ignition (49% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.58% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (50% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (49% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.052% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.013% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0066% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.0066% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.013% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.31% fail on Spark ignition (34% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (37% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.026% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.092% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.033% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.033% fail on Undertray
  • 0.48% fail on Steering (53% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.37% fail on Steering linkage components (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.33% fail on Track rod end (54% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0066% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0066% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.059% fail on Power steering (66% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.039% fail on Operation
      • 0.0066% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.0066% fail on Pump
      • 0.0066% fail on Other components
    • 0.026% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0066% fail on Operation
    • 0.0066% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0066% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.0066% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.0066% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0066% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.14% fail on Identification of the vehicle (55% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plates (55% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.066% fail on Road Wheels (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.039% fail on Attachment (65% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.026% fail on Condition
  • 0.013% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.013% fail on Anchorages