Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2016
70.6% pass rate
from 14,979 tests in 2020
(21% worse than other 2016 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (79% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (42% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators (3.9% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type (3.9% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.79% fail on Side repeaters (6.2% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (1.3% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on All direction indicators (0.55% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment (13% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Battery(ies) (4.4% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0067% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.30% fail on Position lamps (35% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on All position lamps (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.25% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Reversing lamps (82% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors (93% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (7.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Main beam tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres (33% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth (71% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (3.8% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type (40% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes (1.4% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (14% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (23% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums (27% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs (26% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (48% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Cable (8.5% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Brake performance (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (19% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (18% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.55% fail on Service brake performance (3.0% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.027% fail on Service brake imbalance (86% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0067% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.093% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.093% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake performance (52% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.047% fail on Service brake imbalance (49% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance (87% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.047% fail on Rbt (87% better than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.047% fail on Parking brake performance (84% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (97% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Rbt (sp) (97% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Brake performance not tested (57% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.69% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Pedal (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.66% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (82% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.37% fail on Electronic stability control (85% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.28% fail on Flexible brake hoses (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic systems (22% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.020% fail on Rigid brake pipes (85% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (62% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (57% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility (3.2% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers (67% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers (35% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Condition of glass (23% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.28% fail on Windscreen (24% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Window
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Mirrors (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Indirect vision devices (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.10% fail on Driver's view (60% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Bonnet (34% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 2.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.0067% fail on Load limiters
      • 0.0067% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.080% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (67% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 1.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (9.2% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.84% fail on Transmission (44% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.82% fail on Drive shafts (52% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.82% fail on Joints (57% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Prop shafts (54% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Joints (36% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Tank (180% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (43% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Hose (150% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on System (160% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Exhaust system (18% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Body (60% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Panel (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Body condition
    • 0.080% fail on Undertray (190% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Spare wheel (130% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.060% fail on Carrier (170% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel condition (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Doors (38% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Front passenger's door (17% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.033% fail on Door condition (11% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Other passenger's door (32% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Door condition (41% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.0067% fail on Catch
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's door (66% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.013% fail on Door condition (52% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Bumpers (41% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.060% fail on Seats (9.3% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Passenger's seat (140% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.027% fail on Boot lid (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Boot lid condition (5 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.020% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.0067% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0067% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.0067% fail on Load security
      • 0.0067% fail on Loading door
  • 1.3% fail on Suspension (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.56% fail on Suspension arms (27% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (39% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover (64% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.41% fail on Springs (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Coil springs (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Coil spring (51% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Linkage ball joints (68% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.087% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (19% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover (28% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Anti-roll bar (50% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage (42% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.047% fail on Shock absorbers (93% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.040% fail on Wheel bearings (76% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component (81% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Macpherson strut (74% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (47% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Sub-frames (40% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.0067% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0067% fail on Axles
      • 0.0067% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.0067% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.0067% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0067% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0067% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (38% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.83% fail on Exhaust emissions (45% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.56% fail on Compression ignition (51% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.41% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.080% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (62% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.040% fail on Emissions not tested (38% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.027% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.020% fail on Emission control equipment (43% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.013% fail on Other emission control equipment (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
          • 0.0067% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.0067% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition (26% better than other 2016 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (25% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks (31% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.093% fail on Engine oil leaks (17% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.027% fail on Other leaks (87% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Transmission oil leaks (32% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.033% fail on Noise suppression (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.033% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.23% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.14% fail on Steering linkage components (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (61% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0067% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.060% fail on Power steering (58% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.053% fail on Operation (120% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Pipes and hoses (84% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.020% fail on Steering gear (47% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Steering rack (51% better than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.0067% fail on Operation
    • 0.013% fail on Steering play (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
      • 0.013% fail on Steering rack (45% worse than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.20% fail on Identification of the vehicle (31% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Registration plates (33% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0067% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.047% fail on Road Wheels (63% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.033% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Attachment (84% better than other 2016 vans)
  • 0.020% fail on Seat belt installation check (2 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.013% fail on Anchorages (3 times worse than other 2016 vans)
    • 0.0067% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.0067% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0067% fail on Speedometer