MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Berlingo » 2017

Citroen Berlingo MOT Results

Registered in 2017
66.9% pass rate
from 13,258 tests in 2021
(36% worse than other 2017 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Berlingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0075% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0075% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamp aim (47% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (43% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Direction indicators (24% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Flashing type (24% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.48% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.44% fail on Side repeaters (49% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.015% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.58% fail on Electrical equipment (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.54% fail on Horn (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.015% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (57% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.21% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.015% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0075% fail on Switch
    • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps (80% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps (79% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Rear reflectors (81% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.015% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
  • 6.5% fail on Visibility (32% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers (25% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.50% fail on Condition of glass (44% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.49% fail on Windscreen (43% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0075% fail on Window
    • 0.12% fail on View to rear (64% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (66% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0075% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.083% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.0075% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.8% fail on Brakes
    • 3.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (33% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Brake pads (34% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.71% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.71% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.015% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (82% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.0075% fail on Cable
        • 0.0075% fail on Lever
    • 1.1% fail on Brake performance (44% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance (35% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (34% worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.81% fail on Service brake performance (57% worse than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.083% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.13% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.083% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.083% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.045% fail on Parking brake performance (86% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.045% fail on Rbt (85% better than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2017 vans)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.72% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.72% fail on Pedal (170% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.38% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.22% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.16% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.075% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.045% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.023% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.0075% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.0075% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.0075% fail on Lever
    • 0.0075% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0075% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0075% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres (38% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Tread depth (88% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure (57% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Transmission (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Drive shafts (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.0075% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.0075% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.0075% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints
      • 0.0075% fail on Belts
    • 0.37% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.17% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.030% fail on Pipe
      • 0.030% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.15% fail on Body (50% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component (51% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Panel
      • 0.0075% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.060% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.053% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0075% fail on Hinge
      • 0.038% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0075% fail on Catch
      • 0.0075% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0075% fail on Door condition
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.068% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.068% fail on Carrier (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.053% fail on Seats
      • 0.045% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.0075% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
    • 0.023% fail on Chassis
      • 0.023% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.0075% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0075% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0075% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0075% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.0075% fail on Load security
      • 0.0075% fail on Loading door
    • 0.0075% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.0075% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 2.0% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment
      • 0.023% fail on Pre-tensioners (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.0075% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.068% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (35% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition (36% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.81% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.25% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.023% fail on Other emission control equipment
          • 0.0075% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.34% fail on Spark ignition (45% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (48% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.023% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.0075% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.0075% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.091% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.045% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.0075% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.0075% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0075% fail on Undertray
  • 1.4% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Suspension arms (33% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (65% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars (51% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints (50% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.083% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.015% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (90% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.29% fail on Springs (68% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Coil springs (63% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Coil spring (64% better than other 2017 vans)
        • 0.0075% fail on Mounting
    • 0.14% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.075% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.068% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0075% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.023% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.038% fail on Shock absorbers (89% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.015% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.0075% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0075% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 0.34% fail on Steering (46% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering linkage components (35% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.038% fail on Power steering (74% better than other 2017 vans)
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
      • 0.0075% fail on Pump
    • 0.015% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.015% fail on Steering play
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.091% fail on Identification of the vehicle (69% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.091% fail on Registration plates (69% better than other 2017 vans)
  • 0.060% fail on Road Wheels (57% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.030% fail on Attachment (69% better than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.023% fail on Condition
    • 0.0075% fail on Hubs
  • 0.030% fail on Seat belt installation check (5 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.023% fail on Belt(s)/padding (6 times worse than other 2017 vans)
    • 0.0075% fail on Anchorages