MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » C15 » 1990

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1990
49.3% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (57% worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 15% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 15% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 12% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual lamps
    • 12% fail on Headlamps (180% worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp (180% worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Dipswitch
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 9.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 6.8% fail on Fog lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Switch
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 5.5% fail on Battery
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Hazard warning
      • 1.4% fail on Lamp
      • 1.4% fail on Switch
      • 1.4% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.7% fail on Horn
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (10 times worse than other 1990 vans)
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 8.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.4% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 11% fail on Components
        • 5.5% fail on Pipes
        • 4.1% fail on Valves (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Service brake control components
      • 2.7% fail on Pedal
        • 1.4% fail on Condition
        • 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.4% fail on Cable
    • 1.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.4% fail on Restricted movement
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 11% fail on Component mounting
      • 6.8% fail on Subframe mounting (8 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 5.5% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.6% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 9.6% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
        • 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 4.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (4 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (7 times worse than other 1990 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Front
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 11% fail on Tyres (150% worse than other 1990 vans)
    • 6.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.4% fail on Size/type
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Windscreen
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers
  • 9.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 9.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Cap
      • 1.4% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 8.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 8.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
      • 1.4% fail on Attachment
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
    • 1.4% fail on Body condition
  • 1.4% fail on Steering
    • 1.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end