Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 199044.3% pass rate
from 61 tests in 2021
(39% worse than other 1990 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1990 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
39% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(110% worse than other 1990 vans)
-
20% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 20% fail on Headlamp (3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
13% fail on
Headlamp aim
(2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
6.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 3.3% fail on Side repeaters
-
6.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
6.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
6.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 6.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
6.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 4.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
4.9% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.6% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.6% fail on Battery(ies)
- 1.6% fail on Horn
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
20% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
- 8.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
8.2% fail on
Rbt
-
3.3% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
8.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 4.9% fail on Load sensing valves (5 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(9 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
3.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(10 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 1.6% fail on Other braking system component
-
3.3% fail on
Prescribed areas
(10 times worse than other 1990 vans)
-
1.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
1.6% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.6% fail on Brake discs
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
9.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
18% fail on
Suspension
- 8.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
-
1.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes
-
1.6% fail on
Sub-frames
- 1.6% fail on Sub-frame
- 1.6% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
18% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 6.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
4.9% fail on
Transmission
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
- 4.9% fail on Joints
-
4.9% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.9% fail on
Body
(5 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 3.3% fail on Body condition (30 times worse than other 1990 vans)
- 1.6% fail on Other body component
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.6% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
-
1.6% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.6% fail on Hinge
-
1.6% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 8.2% fail on Washers
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
1.6% fail on
Steering
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.6% fail on Track rod end
-
1.6% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.6% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
1.6% fail on
Compression ignition
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions