Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 199146.6% pass rate
from 73 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1991 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
44% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(56% worse than other 1991 vans)
- 23% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
-
16% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
-
16% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 11% fail on Side repeaters (4 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 5.5% fail on Individual lamps
-
16% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
-
14% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Switch
-
9.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.5% fail on Front lamps
- 4.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.7% fail on
Hazard warning
- 2.7% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Horn
- 1.4% fail on Battery
- 1.4% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
29% fail on
Suspension
-
14% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 8.2% fail on Component mounting
- 4.1% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 9.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
9.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
2.7% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.4% fail on Attachment
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Rear
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
14% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
29% fail on
Brakes
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
- 14% fail on Front wheels (140% worse than other 1991 vans)
- 6.8% fail on Rear wheels
- 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.5% fail on
Components
- 4.1% fail on Pipes
- 1.4% fail on Valves
- 1.4% fail on Operation
-
5.5% fail on
Components
-
2.7% fail on
Parking brake
- 2.7% fail on Condition
-
2.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(8 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (15 times worse than other 1991 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
-
1.4% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
- 1.4% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.4% fail on
Pedal
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.4% fail on Cable
-
1.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.4% fail on Brake discs
-
21% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(120% worse than other 1991 vans)
- 9.6% fail on Body condition
-
4.1% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 4.1% fail on Chassis
-
1.4% fail on
Doors
- 1.4% fail on Drivers
-
1.4% fail on
Seats
- 1.4% fail on Drivers
- 1.4% fail on Spare wheel
-
9.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
9.6% fail on
Seat belts
- 9.6% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1991 vans)
-
9.6% fail on
Seat belts
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
5.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 4.1% fail on Washers
- 2.7% fail on Wipers
-
4.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.4% fail on Emissions
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on System
-
2.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 2.7% fail on Registration plate
-
1.4% fail on
Steering
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
1.4% fail on
Steering system