Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1993
54.5% pass rate
from 121 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1993 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 1993 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 1993 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Switch
    • 9.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 9.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 7.4% fail on Side repeaters (5 times worse than other 1993 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.83% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.8% fail on Battery
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.83% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.7% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Horn
    • 0.83% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.83% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 9.9% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1993 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 5.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.83% fail on Brake operation
    • 5.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.5% fail on Components
        • 0.83% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.83% fail on Pipes
        • 0.83% fail on Hoses
      • 2.5% fail on Leaks
      • 0.83% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.83% fail on Operation
    • 1.7% fail on Restricted movement
    • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 19% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 9.1% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.5% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Drive shafts
      • 5.0% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 5.0% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms (30 times worse than other 1993 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (30 times worse than other 1993 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.83% fail on Front
      • 0.83% fail on Rear
    • 0.83% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.83% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.83% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.83% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.9% fail on Tyres
    • 9.1% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 1993 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.83% fail on Pipe
      • 0.83% fail on Cap
  • 5.8% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Chassis
    • 1.7% fail on Body condition
    • 0.83% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.83% fail on Doors
      • 0.83% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.83% fail on Seats
      • 0.83% fail on Drivers
  • 5.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.5% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering system
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.83% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.83% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.83% fail on Registration plate