Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
51.5% pass rate
from 132 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamps (150% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Headlamp (140% worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 9.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.76% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 6.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.3% fail on Side repeaters (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 3.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 2.3% fail on Horn
      • 0.76% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 2.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Hazard warning (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.76% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.76% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 21% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.6% fail on Transmission
      • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 7.6% fail on Joints
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 2.3% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Hose (5 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Chassis
      • 2.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 2.3% fail on Seats
      • 2.3% fail on Driver's seat
    • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.76% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.76% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 11% fail on Rbt
          • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 6.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 6.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 5.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 0.76% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.76% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.0% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 2.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (20 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 0.76% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 2.3% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.76% fail on Servos
      • 0.76% fail on Valves
    • 1.5% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (8 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (9 times worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 0.76% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.76% fail on Pedal
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.76% fail on Lever
    • 0.76% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.76% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.76% fail on Cable
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.0% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.76% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.76% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.76% fail on Springs
      • 0.76% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.76% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.76% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.76% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint
  • 11% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Washers
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Driver's view (10 times worse than other 1994 vans)
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres
    • 5.3% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 1994 vans)
    • 2.3% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.0% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.76% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.76% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.3% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Power steering
      • 0.76% fail on Operation
      • 0.76% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.76% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.76% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.76% fail on Speedometer