Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1994
47.8% pass rate
from 113 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1994 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 17% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 17% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 14% fail on Side repeaters (9 times worse than other 1994 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.88% fail on All direction indicators
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 6.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.88% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Rear lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
    • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.88% fail on Tell tale
    • 2.7% fail on Battery
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.88% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.88% fail on Lamp
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 11% fail on Front wheels
      • 8.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.88% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.2% fail on Components
        • 4.4% fail on Valves
        • 0.88% fail on Pipes
        • 0.88% fail on Hoses
    • 6.2% fail on Prescribed areas (16 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (31 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 0.88% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
      • 0.88% fail on Actuating linkage mounting
    • 0.88% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.88% fail on Pedal
        • 0.88% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.88% fail on Cable
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 12% fail on Component mounting
      • 3.5% fail on Subframe mounting (2 times worse than other 1994 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 9.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 9.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.8% fail on Rear
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.88% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions
    • 0.88% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.88% fail on Pipe
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Wipers
  • 6.2% fail on Steering
    • 3.5% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.88% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.7% fail on Steering operation (7 times worse than other 1994 vans)
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.88% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Chassis
    • 1.8% fail on Body condition
    • 0.88% fail on Body security