MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » C15 » 1997
Dream car or Budget, which comes first? Tell us your thoughts | No thanks

Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1997
42.2% pass rate
from 109 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 37% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 13% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 11% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.3% fail on Headlamps
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.92% fail on Switch
    • 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.4% fail on Battery
    • 6.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.7% fail on Hazard warning (4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 3.7% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.3% fail on Component mounting
      • 4.6% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 2.8% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.2% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 9.2% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
        • 9.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.7% fail on Sub-frames (14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 0.92% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.92% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.4% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.2% fail on Components
        • 3.7% fail on Hoses
        • 2.8% fail on Valves
        • 0.92% fail on Pipes
        • 0.92% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.92% fail on Servos
      • 3.7% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 0.92% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.92% fail on Pedal
        • 0.92% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.92% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.3% fail on Washers
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.92% fail on Windscreen
  • 11% fail on Steering
    • 7.3% fail on Steering system
      • 5.5% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Track rod end
    • 2.8% fail on Steering operation (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Power steering
      • 0.92% fail on Rams
      • 0.92% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 11% fail on Seat belts
      • 11% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.2% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 7.3% fail on Body condition
    • 2.8% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.8% fail on Chassis
    • 1.8% fail on Doors
      • 0.92% fail on Drivers
      • 0.92% fail on Passengers front
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.92% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.92% fail on System
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate