Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 199742.2% pass rate
from 109 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
37% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
13% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
13% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 11% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 1.8% fail on Individual lamps
-
13% fail on
Flashing type
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim
-
8.3% fail on
Headlamps
- 7.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.92% fail on Switch
- 7.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 6.4% fail on Battery
-
6.4% fail on
Position lamps
- 4.6% fail on Front lamps
- 3.7% fail on Rear lamps
- 4.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Switch (10 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.8% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
13% fail on
Direction indicators
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
24% fail on
Suspension
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 8.3% fail on Component mounting
- 4.6% fail on Subframe mounting
- 2.8% fail on Spring mounting
-
9.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 9.2% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
3.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.7% fail on
Sub-frames
(14 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 0.92% fail on Attachment
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.92% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.92% fail on Condition
-
13% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
- 10% fail on Front wheels
- 6.4% fail on Service brake performance
- 4.6% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.8% fail on Parking brake performance
-
12% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.2% fail on
Components
- 3.7% fail on Hoses
- 2.8% fail on Valves
- 0.92% fail on Pipes
- 0.92% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.92% fail on Servos
- 3.7% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
9.2% fail on
Components
-
0.92% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.92% fail on Condition
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.92% fail on
Pedal
- 0.92% fail on Condition
-
0.92% fail on
Pedal
- 0.92% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.92% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.92% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
-
16% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.3% fail on Washers
- 6.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.92% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Steering
-
7.3% fail on
Steering system
- 5.5% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 1997 vans)
- 2.8% fail on Track rod end
- 2.8% fail on Steering operation (9 times worse than other 1997 vans)
-
1.8% fail on
Power steering
- 0.92% fail on Rams
- 0.92% fail on Other components
-
7.3% fail on
Steering system
-
11% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
11% fail on
Seat belts
- 11% fail on Prescribed areas
-
11% fail on
Seat belts
-
9.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 7.3% fail on Body condition
-
2.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 2.8% fail on Chassis
-
1.8% fail on
Doors
- 0.92% fail on Drivers
- 0.92% fail on Passengers front
-
7.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 7.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.92% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.92% fail on System
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 5.5% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate