Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1998
54.3% pass rate
from 70 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 5.7% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.7% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Hazard warning (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
      • 2.9% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 1998 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.4% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 20% fail on Brake performance
      • 14% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
          • 8.6% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1998 vans)
          • 5.7% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 11% fail on Service brake performance
        • 11% fail on Rbt
          • 11% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 1998 vans)
          • 2.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 4.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 2.9% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 2.9% fail on Pedal
    • 2.9% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.4% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.4% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 1.4% fail on Cable
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Springs
      • 1.4% fail on Coil springs
        • 1.4% fail on Coil spring
    • 1.4% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Chassis
      • 4.3% fail on Chassis condition
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission
      • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.9% fail on Joints
      • 1.4% fail on Prop shafts
        • 1.4% fail on Joints
    • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame
        • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame condition
      • 1.4% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on System
    • 1.4% fail on Floor
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.3% fail on Condition
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.4% fail on Washers
  • 5.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
  • 2.9% fail on Steering
    • 2.9% fail on Steering gear
      • 2.9% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.4% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 1.4% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 1.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo