Citroen C15 MOT Results
Registered in 199943.1% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.
-
38% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 14% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
- 10% fail on Headlamp
-
10% fail on
Direction indicators
-
10% fail on
Flashing type
- 8.6% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
- 1.7% fail on All direction indicators
-
10% fail on
Flashing type
- 10% fail on Headlamp aim
-
8.6% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.2% fail on Front lamps
- 1.7% fail on All position lamps
- 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
-
3.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.4% fail on Fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Battery
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
24% fail on
Brakes
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
- 12% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.2% fail on Front wheels
- 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
3.4% fail on
Components
- 1.7% fail on Pipes
- 1.7% fail on Valves
- 1.7% fail on Operation
-
3.4% fail on
Components
-
3.4% fail on
Hub components
- 1.7% fail on Brake pads
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake control components
-
1.7% fail on
Pedal
- 1.7% fail on Anti-slip
-
1.7% fail on
Pedal
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.7% fail on Cable
-
19% fail on
Brake performance
-
21% fail on
Suspension
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 14% fail on Component mounting
- 1.7% fail on Spring mounting
- 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting
-
3.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.4% fail on Condition
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
-
3.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
3.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Trailing arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Radius arms
- 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.7% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.7% fail on Rear
-
16% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
14% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(160% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 1999 vans)
- 14% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
14% fail on
Seat belts
(180% worse than other 1999 vans)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 10% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.7% fail on Pipe
- 1.7% fail on System
- 1.7% fail on Emissions
-
12% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
5.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 5.2% fail on Chassis
- 3.4% fail on Body condition
- 1.7% fail on Speedometer
-
1.7% fail on
Seats
- 1.7% fail on Passengers
-
5.2% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
12% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 8.6% fail on Wipers
- 5.2% fail on Washers
-
8.6% fail on
Steering
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
- 8.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
-
8.6% fail on
Steering system
-
5.2% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 5.2% fail on Registration plate
-
3.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.4% fail on Condition