Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 1999
43.1% pass rate
from 58 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 14% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 10% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 10% fail on Headlamps
      • 10% fail on Headlamp
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators
      • 10% fail on Flashing type
        • 8.6% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 1999 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on All direction indicators
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 8.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on All position lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 3.4% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Battery
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 19% fail on Brake performance
      • 12% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.2% fail on Front wheels
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.4% fail on Components
        • 1.7% fail on Pipes
        • 1.7% fail on Valves
      • 1.7% fail on Operation
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.7% fail on Pedal
        • 1.7% fail on Anti-slip
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.7% fail on Cable
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 16% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 14% fail on Component mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 3.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Trailing arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Radius arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.7% fail on Rear
  • 14% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 1999 vans)
    • 14% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 1999 vans)
      • 14% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Pipe
      • 1.7% fail on System
    • 1.7% fail on Emissions
  • 12% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 5.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 5.2% fail on Chassis
    • 3.4% fail on Body condition
    • 1.7% fail on Speedometer
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Passengers
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.6% fail on Wipers
    • 5.2% fail on Washers
  • 8.6% fail on Steering
    • 8.6% fail on Steering system
      • 8.6% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 1999 vans)
  • 5.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 5.2% fail on Registration plate
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Condition