Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
46.3% pass rate
from 164 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 12% fail on Headlamp aim (92% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (170% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.61% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 9.8% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 8.5% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.61% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.61% fail on Individual lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.9% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Battery
    • 1.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.2% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.61% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.61% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.61% fail on Switch
  • 27% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 8.5% fail on Component mounting (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.61% fail on Spring mounting
    • 9.8% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 9.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.61% fail on Drive shafts
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment
    • 3.0% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.4% fail on Front
      • 0.61% fail on Rear
    • 2.4% fail on Coil springs
      • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.61% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.61% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.61% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 24% fail on Brakes
    • 16% fail on Brake performance
      • 7.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 7.3% fail on Front wheels (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 10% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.8% fail on Components
        • 5.5% fail on Pipes
        • 4.3% fail on Valves (190% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.61% fail on Leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.61% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.4% fail on Service brake control components
      • 2.4% fail on Pedal
        • 1.8% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.61% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.61% fail on Pipe
    • 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet
  • 5.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 5.5% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 4.9% fail on Tyres
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.61% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 3.0% fail on Body condition
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Chassis
    • 1.2% fail on Doors
      • 0.61% fail on Drivers
      • 0.61% fail on Passengers front
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.8% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
        • 0.61% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.61% fail on Steering control
      • 0.61% fail on Steering lock
  • 1.2% fail on Towbars
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
  • 1.2% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.61% fail on Vehicle Identification Number