Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2004
40.9% pass rate
from 115 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (58% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 15% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 15% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 12% fail on Headlamps (180% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 10% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 8.7% fail on Side repeaters (7 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 5.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.2% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.2% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.87% fail on Switch
    • 3.5% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 3.5% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.87% fail on Switch
  • 26% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (130% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Springs
      • 7.0% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 7.0% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.6% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.6% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.6% fail on Sub-frame (14 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.87% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.87% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.87% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 23% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 6.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2004 vans)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 8.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 8.7% fail on Rbt
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt
          • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 3.5% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 2.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 2.6% fail on Pedal (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 2.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.6% fail on Other components and prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 2.6% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting (35 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.87% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.87% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 0.87% fail on Servos
      • 0.87% fail on Valves
  • 17% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2004 vans)
      • 10% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 10% fail on Joints (160% worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 2.6% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Panel
      • 0.87% fail on Other body component
    • 2.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's door (6 times worse than other 2004 vans)
        • 0.87% fail on Door condition
        • 0.87% fail on Catch
      • 0.87% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.87% fail on Hinge
    • 1.7% fail on Floor (12 times worse than other 2004 vans)
    • 0.87% fail on Chassis
      • 0.87% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.87% fail on Seats
      • 0.87% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility
    • 4.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.87% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.87% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.87% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.87% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 4.3% fail on Seat belts
      • 4.3% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 3.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.87% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.87% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.87% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.87% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  • 1.7% fail on Steering
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.87% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.87% fail on Registration plates