Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
45.9% pass rate
from 133 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 46% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 17% fail on Headlamp aim (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 14% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 14% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 14% fail on Side repeaters (13 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 14% fail on Stop lamp (90% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Headlamp (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 9.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.8% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.5% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.75% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Battery
    • 0.75% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.75% fail on Lamp
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 7.5% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 6.8% fail on Component mounting (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.75% fail on Spring mounting
    • 5.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 5.3% fail on Condition
    • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts
      • 4.5% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.75% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 2.3% fail on Front
    • 1.5% fail on Tie bars/rods (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.75% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.75% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Attachment
    • 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
  • 21% fail on Brakes
    • 14% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.5% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 6.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.0% fail on Components
        • 5.3% fail on Valves (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.75% fail on Pipes
        • 0.75% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.75% fail on Leaks
    • 2.3% fail on Hub components
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake control components
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal
        • 1.5% fail on Anti-slip
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
  • 8.3% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 3.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.75% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.75% fail on System
    • 0.75% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 6.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition
    • 1.5% fail on Doors
      • 0.75% fail on Drivers
      • 0.75% fail on Passengers front
    • 1.5% fail on Seats
      • 1.5% fail on Drivers
    • 0.75% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.75% fail on Chassis
    • 0.75% fail on Body security
  • 3.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 1.5% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering system
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end