Citroen C15 MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.8% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C15 is unusually good or bad.

  • 31% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamps (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 9.8% fail on Headlamp (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 11% fail on Direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 11% fail on Flashing type (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 7.1% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 9.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.89% fail on Switch
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.89% fail on Switch
    • 0.89% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.89% fail on Battery(ies)
  • 25% fail on Brakes
    • 21% fail on Brake performance (94% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 14% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 12% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 4.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.89% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 12% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 11% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 8.0% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 3.6% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.89% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.89% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 0.89% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.89% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.6% fail on Load sensing valves (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.89% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.89% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.89% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.89% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.89% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.89% fail on Valves
    • 0.89% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.89% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 8.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.4% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.89% fail on Axles
      • 0.89% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.89% fail on Springs
      • 0.89% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.89% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.89% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.89% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 16% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.1% fail on Transmission
      • 7.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 7.1% fail on Joints
        • 0.89% fail on Bearing housing
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.89% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 1.8% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.8% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Body
      • 1.8% fail on Panel
    • 0.89% fail on Chassis
      • 0.89% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.89% fail on Seats
      • 0.89% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.8% fail on Visibility
    • 6.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.89% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.89% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.89% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.89% fail on View to rear
      • 0.89% fail on Mirrors
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 5.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Size/type (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 3.6% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 3.6% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.6% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 2.7% fail on Steering
    • 2.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
  • 2.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.89% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.89% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.89% fail on Engine oil leaks