MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » C25 » 1989

Citroen C25 MOT Results

Registered in 1989
41.7% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2021
(38% worse than other 1989 vans)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.

  • 42% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (110% worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 22% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 22% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 12% fail on Direction indicators
      • 12% fail on Flashing type
        • 6.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 3.3% fail on All direction indicators (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
    • 10% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 10% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 6.7% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 3.3% fail on Horn
    • 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 10% fail on Exhaust system
    • 8.3% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
        • 8.3% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 5.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 5.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 1.7% fail on Body
      • 1.7% fail on Panel
    • 1.7% fail on Seats
      • 1.7% fail on Driver's seat
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 13% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt
          • 6.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 6.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 5.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 5.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.3% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 3.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.7% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.7% fail on Servos
    • 1.7% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 1.7% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 8.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers (11 times worse than other 1989 vans)
    • 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.7% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.7% fail on Suspension rods
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers
    • 5.0% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.7% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.0% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.7% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.7% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.7% fail on Attachment