Citroen C25 MOT Results
Registered in 198941.5% pass rate
from 53 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen C25 is unusually good or bad.
-
38% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
19% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
- 19% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 1.9% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
11% fail on
Position lamps
- 9.4% fail on Front lamps
- 3.8% fail on Rear lamps
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Battery
- 3.8% fail on Electrical wiring (10 times worse than other 1989 vans)
- 3.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
3.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual lamps
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.8% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.9% fail on Lamp
- 1.9% fail on Switch
- 3.8% fail on Horn
-
1.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
-
19% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 1989 vans)
-
30% fail on
Suspension
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 7.5% fail on Component mounting
- 7.5% fail on Spring mounting
-
13% fail on
Drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(6 times worse than other 1989 vans)
- 11% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Drive shafts
-
13% fail on
Front drive shafts
(6 times worse than other 1989 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 3.8% fail on Condition
-
1.9% fail on
Leaf springs
-
1.9% fail on
Pins and bushes
- 1.9% fail on Shackle
-
1.9% fail on
Pins and bushes
-
1.9% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints
-
15% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
26% fail on
Brakes
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
- 9.4% fail on Rear wheels
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels
- 3.8% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.8% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.9% fail on Brake imbalance
-
7.5% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
5.7% fail on
Components
- 3.8% fail on Pipes
- 1.9% fail on Valves
- 1.9% fail on Leaks
-
5.7% fail on
Components
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.9% fail on Cable
-
1.9% fail on
Hub components
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs
-
17% fail on
Brake performance
-
17% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 13% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.8% fail on
Fuel system
- 3.8% fail on Cap (5 times worse than other 1989 vans)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions
-
15% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 13% fail on Wipers
- 3.8% fail on Washers
-
7.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
3.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 3.8% fail on Chassis
- 3.8% fail on Body condition
-
1.9% fail on
Seats
- 1.9% fail on Passengers
- 1.9% fail on Drivers
-
3.8% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
5.7% fail on
Tyres
- 5.7% fail on Condition
-
3.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
- 1.9% fail on Track rod end
-
1.9% fail on
Steering system
-
1.9% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate