MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2005
Do you have a minute to answer an electric vehicle survey? Start the survey | No thanks

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2005
47.2% pass rate
from 2,197 tests in 2020
(6.0% worse than other 2005 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.0% fail on Electrical equipment (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.4% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.046% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.8% fail on Position lamp
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Side repeaters (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 2.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.46% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.091% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (30% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (65% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.091% fail on Switch
    • 0.36% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.18% fail on Switch
    • 0.046% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (87% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 7.1% fail on Ball joint (70% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 3.4% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.8% fail on Springs (27% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Coil springs
        • 2.6% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.091% fail on Mounting
      • 0.091% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.7% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Sub-frame (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.96% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.1% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (50% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers (41% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.73% fail on Axles (5 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Axle
      • 0.046% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut (160% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.091% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.046% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.36% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.046% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.046% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.046% fail on Other components
  • 20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (51% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 8.5% fail on Transmission (89% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 8.2% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.091% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts (69% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Joints
    • 7.3% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Integral vehicle structure (45% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 2.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame condition (9 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.86% fail on Body
      • 0.55% fail on Other body component
      • 0.32% fail on Panel
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.27% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on System
      • 0.046% fail on Hose
    • 0.50% fail on Towbar (150% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
    • 0.46% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.27% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.27% fail on Door condition
      • 0.091% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.091% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.18% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.046% fail on Bracket
    • 0.14% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.14% fail on Carrier
    • 0.091% fail on Load security
      • 0.046% fail on Loading door
      • 0.046% fail on Access panel
    • 0.091% fail on Floor
    • 0.046% fail on Seats
      • 0.046% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.046% fail on Cabs
      • 0.046% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Brakes (13% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance (26% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Service brake performance (38% worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (39% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (46% worse than other 2005 vans)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.046% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.046% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (76% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.59% fail on Rbt (75% better than other 2005 vans)
          • 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.41% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.36% fail on Cable
        • 0.046% fail on Linkage
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.27% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.1% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.96% fail on Pedal (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic systems (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.18% fail on Valves
      • 0.091% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.55% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.36% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.091% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.14% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.091% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.046% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
        • 0.046% fail on Other braking system component
      • 0.046% fail on Other components
    • 0.046% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.046% fail on Lever
  • 9.9% fail on Visibility
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers
    • 3.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on View to rear
      • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.27% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.27% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.18% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.091% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.9% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.41% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (45% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.64% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.55% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.046% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.046% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.27% fail on Spark ignition (65% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.091% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.091% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (83% better than other 2005 vans)
        • 0.046% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.046% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.046% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.046% fail on Other leaks
  • 4.3% fail on Steering (32% better than other 2005 vans)
    • 3.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.1% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.091% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.046% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.046% fail on Lock stop
    • 0.59% fail on Power steering
      • 0.27% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear (81% better than other 2005 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (80% better than other 2005 vans)
  • 4.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.55% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment
    • 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Airbags
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.091% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.091% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.091% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.091% fail on Attachment