Citroen Dispatch MOT Results
Registered in 200549.2% pass rate
from 2,484 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.
-
30% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 9.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
8.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 7.0% fail on Front lamps
- 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.081% fail on All position lamps
- 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim (22% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp (22% better than other 2005 vans)
-
5.3% fail on
Headlamps
(41% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 5.2% fail on Headlamp (40% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Matched pair (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.040% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.040% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.040% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.040% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.040% fail on Switch
-
4.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.5% fail on Individual lamps (41% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.64% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
4.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.8% fail on Horn (120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Battery
-
0.85% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.81% fail on Fog lamp (73% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Tell tale
- 0.040% fail on Switch
- 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.28% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.20% fail on Lamp
- 0.081% fail on Switch (80% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.081% fail on Rear reflectors (81% better than other 2005 vans)
-
25% fail on
Suspension
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(88% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (91% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Attachment
-
8.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
8.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (130% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Couplings
-
0.12% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.12% fail on Drive shafts
-
8.3% fail on
Front drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 3.7% fail on Front suspension joints (54% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
2.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Location
-
2.7% fail on
Prescribed areas
(46% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting (37% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.0% fail on Subframe mounting (88% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Spring mounting (92% better than other 2005 vans)
-
2.0% fail on
Trailing arms
(16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (16 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.4% fail on
Sub-frames
(7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.89% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.40% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (10 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.81% fail on
Wheel bearings
(64% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.76% fail on Front (58% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Rear
-
0.60% fail on
Shock absorbers
(69% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Condition (69% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.28% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (95% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Radius arms
(4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2005 vans)
-
0.24% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.24% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.081% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.081% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.081% fail on Condition
-
0.040% fail on
Leaf springs
- 0.040% fail on Anchor bracket
-
0.040% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.040% fail on Attachment
-
8.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(88% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(13% better than other 2005 vans)
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2005 vans)
- 4.5% fail on Front wheels (53% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Rear wheels (45% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (79% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.52% fail on Service brake performance (61% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.040% fail on Brake operation
-
6.8% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
6.2% fail on
Components
- 3.7% fail on Pipes (32% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.7% fail on Valves (77% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.85% fail on Hoses
- 0.36% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.040% fail on Cylinders
- 0.040% fail on Servos
- 0.040% fail on Pump
- 0.36% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.20% fail on Leaks
-
6.2% fail on
Components
-
2.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.2% fail on Brake pads
- 0.44% fail on Brake discs (54% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.040% fail on Brake back plates
- 0.040% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 1.1% fail on ABS
-
0.76% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.76% fail on
Pedal
- 0.68% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.081% fail on Condition
-
0.76% fail on
Pedal
-
0.60% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.60% fail on Cable
-
0.48% fail on
Parking brake
(61% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.48% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.12% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.081% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.081% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
-
0.040% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.040% fail on Leaks
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(26% better than other 2005 vans)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 6.8% fail on Wipers
- 3.1% fail on Washers (26% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.72% fail on Windscreen
- 0.040% fail on Bonnet
-
10% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(77% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2005 vans)
-
1.0% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.81% fail on System (96% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
- 0.040% fail on Tank
- 0.040% fail on Hose
- 0.040% fail on Cap
- 0.93% fail on Emissions
- 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested
-
9.2% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
- 0.20% fail on Valve stem
-
4.3% fail on
Steering
(33% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.6% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2005 vans)
- 2.7% fail on Track rod end (29% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack (81% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.081% fail on Steering arm
-
0.040% fail on
Free play
- 0.040% fail on Steering rack
-
0.040% fail on
Other components
- 0.040% fail on Steering component
-
0.76% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Operation
- 0.32% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.20% fail on Other components
- 0.040% fail on Drive system
- 0.081% fail on Steering operation
-
0.040% fail on
Steering control
- 0.040% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.040% fail on Locking devices
-
3.6% fail on
Steering system
(34% better than other 2005 vans)
-
3.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts
(38% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (43% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.68% fail on Condition
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
3.2% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(39% better than other 2005 vans)
- 1.4% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 2005 vans)
-
0.93% fail on
Doors
- 0.68% fail on Passengers other (110% worse than other 2005 vans)
- 0.24% fail on Passengers front
- 0.040% fail on Drivers
-
0.64% fail on
Vehicle structure
(49% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.64% fail on Chassis (49% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.12% fail on Engine mountings
- 0.081% fail on Body security
-
0.081% fail on
Seats
(80% better than other 2005 vans)
- 0.040% fail on Passengers
- 0.040% fail on Drivers
- 0.081% fail on Spare wheel
- 0.040% fail on Speedometer
-
0.040% fail on
Load security
- 0.040% fail on Loading door
-
0.85% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.85% fail on Registration plate
-
0.24% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
-
0.081% fail on
Towbars
- 0.040% fail on Towbar
- 0.040% fail on Vehicle structure