Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.1% pass rate
from 2,757 tests in 2017
(27% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (39% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Position lamps (96% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 13% fail on Front lamps (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.073% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.1% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (77% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.44% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (64% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp (45% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.036% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.036% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.036% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.44% fail on Horn
    • 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.15% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.11% fail on Switch
      • 0.036% fail on Lamp
    • 0.073% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.036% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 22% fail on Suspension (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Front drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Constant velocity joints (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.073% fail on Couplings
      • 0.22% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Attachment
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (75% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.98% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.87% fail on Front
      • 0.11% fail on Rear
    • 0.22% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.18% fail on General condition (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.073% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.073% fail on Condition (97% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.073% fail on Air suspension (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Suspension unit
      • 0.036% fail on Other components
    • 0.073% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.036% fail on Panhard rods
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment
    • 0.036% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.036% fail on Clearance
  • 13% fail on Driver's view of the road (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (60% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.9% fail on Washers (91% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.1% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 5.6% fail on Hub components (28% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.2% fail on Brake pads (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.51% fail on Brake discs (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (41% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.40% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.036% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.036% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Service brake control components (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.3% fail on Anti-slip (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Hydraulic systems (75% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.44% fail on Components (83% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.29% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.073% fail on Pipes (97% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.15% fail on Operation
      • 0.11% fail on Leaks
    • 0.47% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on ABS
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.073% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.073% fail on Cable
    • 0.036% fail on Additional braking devices
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres (30% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Tread depth (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
    • 0.15% fail on Valve stem
  • 3.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.47% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.22% fail on System
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
      • 0.073% fail on Tank
      • 0.073% fail on Pipe
    • 0.22% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.073% fail on Emissions
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (44% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.2% fail on Steering system (62% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.83% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Free play
        • 0.073% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.036% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.58% fail on Power steering
      • 0.33% fail on Operation
      • 0.29% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.036% fail on Pump
    • 0.25% fail on Steering control (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering wheel (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Steering column
      • 0.036% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.036% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.036% fail on Steering operation
  • 1.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.83% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.69% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.58% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment
      • 0.036% fail on Requirements
  • 0.87% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.47% fail on Body condition
    • 0.15% fail on Body security
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.073% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.073% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.036% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.47% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.47% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment