Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.2% pass rate
from 3,094 tests in 2020
(20% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (32% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 9.6% fail on Stop lamp (58% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (23% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Position lamps (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 5.6% fail on Position lamp (61% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (49% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.032% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.032% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.39% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.5% fail on Direction indicators (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.5% fail on Flashing type (68% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.42% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators (160% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Switch (8 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (46% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Switch
    • 0.78% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.42% fail on Horn
      • 0.36% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.36% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.36% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.29% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.29% fail on Switch
    • 0.097% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 19% fail on Body, chassis, structure (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 16% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 15% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 15% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.065% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.032% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.74% fail on Prop shafts (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.74% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.45% fail on Doors
      • 0.26% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.23% fail on Door condition
        • 0.032% fail on Catch
      • 0.13% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.065% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.032% fail on Door condition
        • 0.032% fail on Catch
    • 0.36% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Panel
      • 0.16% fail on Other body component
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.26% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
      • 0.065% fail on System
      • 0.032% fail on Tank
      • 0.032% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.13% fail on Carrier
      • 0.032% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.097% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.032% fail on Bracket
    • 0.065% fail on Seats
      • 0.065% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.032% fail on Chassis
      • 0.032% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.032% fail on Floor
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Suspension arms (79% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 6.6% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes (95% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (35% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.52% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (48% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.42% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.39% fail on Linkage
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.032% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.84% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.55% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Springs (96% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (93% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.16% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (14 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.065% fail on Macpherson strut (79% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.032% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.032% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.032% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.032% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Visibility (42% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Washers (74% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Wipers (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.78% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.78% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.71% fail on View to rear
      • 0.68% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.032% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.19% fail on Driver's view
  • 10% fail on Brakes (23% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance (24% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (54% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (53% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (37% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (39% better than other 2010 vans)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.032% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.032% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.032% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.65% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.65% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.032% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.84% fail on Brake discs and drums (45% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.84% fail on Brake discs (44% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.19% fail on Cable
        • 0.065% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.032% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.52% fail on Flexible brake hoses (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.36% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (60% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.36% fail on Anti-lock braking system (53% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.19% fail on Parking brake control (63% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.19% fail on Lever (63% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.065% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.032% fail on Master cylinder
      • 0.032% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.032% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.032% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth (26% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (19% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (30% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (40% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.68% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (69% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.16% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.065% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.065% fail on Other emission control equipment (10 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.032% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.097% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.032% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.032% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
    • 1.1% fail on Fluid leaks (97% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.90% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.032% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.065% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.032% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.032% fail on Undertray
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (56% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.90% fail on Steering linkage components (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.84% fail on Track rod end (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.48% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.45% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.032% fail on Operation
    • 0.42% fail on Power steering
      • 0.23% fail on Other components
      • 0.16% fail on Operation
      • 0.065% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.16% fail on Steering wheel (5 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.065% fail on Steering play
      • 0.065% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.032% fail on Steering column
    • 0.032% fail on Steering shaft
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (41% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.71% fail on Condition
      • 0.032% fail on Attachment
      • 0.032% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.36% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (52% better than other 2010 vans)
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.097% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.065% fail on Attachment
    • 0.032% fail on Hubs
  • 0.032% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.032% fail on Doors
      • 0.032% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors