MOT Results

Honest John Vans MOT Results » Citroen » Dispatch » 2010

Citroen Dispatch MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.1% pass rate
from 2,797 tests in 2021
(15% worse than other 2010 vans)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 vans and highlighted areas where the Citroen Dispatch is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (27% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp (55% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 5.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (37% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (44% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.8% fail on Direction indicators (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 4.8% fail on Flashing type (65% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 4.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.036% fail on Switch
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.68% fail on Hazard warning (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.68% fail on Switch (100% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.25% fail on Electrical wiring (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.43% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.39% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.036% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps (58% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps (57% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.036% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.036% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 18% fail on Body, chassis, structure (130% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 14% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 14% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 14% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.072% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.46% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.46% fail on Joints
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.61% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.43% fail on Doors
      • 0.29% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.25% fail on Door condition
        • 0.036% fail on Catch
      • 0.072% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.072% fail on Door condition
      • 0.072% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.072% fail on Door condition
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Tank
      • 0.11% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.072% fail on Pipe
      • 0.036% fail on Hose
      • 0.036% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.32% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.25% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.072% fail on Bracket
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.072% fail on Panel
      • 0.072% fail on Other body component
      • 0.036% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure (86% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (86% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.036% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.036% fail on Carrier
    • 0.072% fail on Load security
      • 0.072% fail on Loading door
    • 0.036% fail on Chassis
      • 0.036% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.036% fail on Towbar
      • 0.036% fail on Vehicle structure
    • 0.036% fail on Seats
      • 0.036% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 9.4% fail on Suspension arms (62% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 8.3% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.97% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.36% fail on Pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Suspension arm
    • 8.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (36% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (66% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (81% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.64% fail on Springs (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.64% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.64% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.54% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.32% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.18% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (88% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.072% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.072% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.036% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.036% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
  • 12% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 7.0% fail on Washers (67% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers
    • 0.50% fail on View to rear
      • 0.46% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.036% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.32% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.036% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance (20% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (33% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (32% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.072% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.7% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.86% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.86% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
        • 0.036% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.46% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.36% fail on Cable
        • 0.14% fail on Lever
    • 2.1% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.8% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.32% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.75% fail on Lever
    • 0.54% fail on Flexible brake hoses (120% worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.32% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (77% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system (76% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.036% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.21% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.036% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.036% fail on Leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (30% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 2.4% fail on Compression ignition (47% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.50% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.43% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (77% better than other 2010 vans)
        • 0.036% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.036% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.072% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.82% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.68% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (42% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components (66% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (64% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (140% worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.50% fail on Other components (3 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.43% fail on Operation (2 times worse than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.036% fail on Rams
    • 0.64% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering wheel (7 times worse than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.036% fail on Steering play
      • 0.036% fail on Steering rack
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (47% better than other 2010 vans)
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts (52% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas (87% better than other 2010 vans)
      • 0.036% fail on Requirements
      • 0.036% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.57% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.036% fail on Attachment